freeamfva's blog
The new ERC-4337 update proposal has been announced by Vitalik Buterin. The ETHereum developer has discussed the new features that will be introduced with the update and the possibilities that the new ERC brings to the network.To get more news about BCH, you can visit wikibit.com official website.
Account Abstraction introduction
The most important update for the ETHereum network will be Account Abstraction, which has been awaited by both the developer and user communities. The update adds new verification logic for individual users' wallets. It creates new functions for wallet developers, which will now be able to implement futures like multiple signatures, social recovery and new signature algorithms.
The aforementioned functions are already present in the modern wallet, but in order to use them, developers have to use additional transactions and spend excessive amounts of GAS. Users have to hold some ETH on an external account or use relay systems that usually work in a centralized manner.
Previously presented EIP-2938 was already designed to fix the issue, but it also required Ethereum protocol changes that do not mesh well with the current developer focus (the scalability issue). In the newly presented proposal, the same goals will be achieved without consensus-layer protocol changes.
How does the new proposal work？
The key function that the update will bring is the new transaction logic that allows the implementation of new uses without changing Ethereum's protocol. With EIP-4339, developers decided to create a new layer that will contain the user's commands and create a queue that will then be bundled and sent out to the block as a transaction.
In his article, Buterin described numerous properties that the new transaction logic brings to the chain. Actors on the chain will now be decentralized since everything is being done through a P2P mempool, simplified user-side wallet setup, full EIP-1559 support and DOS attack protection.
An early version of the update is expected to be released soon. Right after that, the proposal will go through safety audits and will be released on testnet.
For more blockchain news, please download WikiBit- the Global Blockchain Regulatory Inquiry APP.
Account Abstraction introduction
The most important update for the ETHereum network will be Account Abstraction, which has been awaited by both the developer and user communities. The update adds new verification logic for individual users' wallets. It creates new functions for wallet developers, which will now be able to implement futures like multiple signatures, social recovery and new signature algorithms.
The aforementioned functions are already present in the modern wallet, but in order to use them, developers have to use additional transactions and spend excessive amounts of GAS. Users have to hold some ETH on an external account or use relay systems that usually work in a centralized manner.
Previously presented EIP-2938 was already designed to fix the issue, but it also required Ethereum protocol changes that do not mesh well with the current developer focus (the scalability issue). In the newly presented proposal, the same goals will be achieved without consensus-layer protocol changes.
How does the new proposal work？
The key function that the update will bring is the new transaction logic that allows the implementation of new uses without changing Ethereum's protocol. With EIP-4339, developers decided to create a new layer that will contain the user's commands and create a queue that will then be bundled and sent out to the block as a transaction.
In his article, Buterin described numerous properties that the new transaction logic brings to the chain. Actors on the chain will now be decentralized since everything is being done through a P2P mempool, simplified user-side wallet setup, full EIP-1559 support and DOS attack protection.
An early version of the update is expected to be released soon. Right after that, the proposal will go through safety audits and will be released on testnet.
For more blockchain news, please download WikiBit- the Global Blockchain Regulatory Inquiry APP.
The Bank of England today announced members of two forums that will explore a potential central bank digital currency (CBDC) in the UK. The forum members include PayPal and Google bigwigs among representatives from many Silicon Valley giants.To get more news about LTC, you can visit wikibit.com official website.
CBDCs are digital versions of a fiat currency—like pound sterling, the euro or dollar—backed by a central bank. Countries around the world are currently researching the benefits of developing them. Some countries—such as China and the Bahamas—have already rolled out or are in the testing stages of a CBDC project.
The UK has so far been comparatively slow, and has only announced research into such an asset. But todays announcement shows that the Bank of England is at least consulting with top experts in the tech and finance space. The forum will research and provide feedback to the Bank on how a CBDC could—or couldn't—work in the UK.
“The Forum will help the Bank to understand the technological challenges of designing, implementing and operating a CBDC,” the announcement read.
The members of the CBDC Engagement Forum and CBDC Technology Forum include Edwin Aoki, who serves as CTO, blockchain, cryptocurrency and digital currencies at PayPal, Matthieu Saint Olive, the CBDC and payments manager at ConsenSys, and Ashley Lannquist, project lead, blockchain and digital currency at the World Economic Forum. (Disclosure: ConsenSys Mesh funds an editorially independent Decrypt.)
Other members include Mark Shaw, director of global payments strategy for music streaming provider Spotify, Charlotte Hogg, the CEO of Visa Europe, and Diana Layfield, the president of EMEA partnerships at Google.
The two forums merged in April to explore whether a CBDC will work in the UK. The idea with a CBDC, in the UK at least, is that it would work to compliment cash but would be a fast and secure way of sending money and making payments.
Bank of England boss Andrew Bailey has repeatedly said that he doesnt consider decentralized digital assets, like Bitcoin, to be money.
But he has said stablecoins—assets pegged to fiat currencies though different to CBDCs—could become an important part of the future financial landscape.
For more blockchain news, please download WikiBit- the Global Blockchain Regulatory Inquiry APP.
CBDCs are digital versions of a fiat currency—like pound sterling, the euro or dollar—backed by a central bank. Countries around the world are currently researching the benefits of developing them. Some countries—such as China and the Bahamas—have already rolled out or are in the testing stages of a CBDC project.
The UK has so far been comparatively slow, and has only announced research into such an asset. But todays announcement shows that the Bank of England is at least consulting with top experts in the tech and finance space. The forum will research and provide feedback to the Bank on how a CBDC could—or couldn't—work in the UK.
“The Forum will help the Bank to understand the technological challenges of designing, implementing and operating a CBDC,” the announcement read.
The members of the CBDC Engagement Forum and CBDC Technology Forum include Edwin Aoki, who serves as CTO, blockchain, cryptocurrency and digital currencies at PayPal, Matthieu Saint Olive, the CBDC and payments manager at ConsenSys, and Ashley Lannquist, project lead, blockchain and digital currency at the World Economic Forum. (Disclosure: ConsenSys Mesh funds an editorially independent Decrypt.)
Other members include Mark Shaw, director of global payments strategy for music streaming provider Spotify, Charlotte Hogg, the CEO of Visa Europe, and Diana Layfield, the president of EMEA partnerships at Google.
The two forums merged in April to explore whether a CBDC will work in the UK. The idea with a CBDC, in the UK at least, is that it would work to compliment cash but would be a fast and secure way of sending money and making payments.
Bank of England boss Andrew Bailey has repeatedly said that he doesnt consider decentralized digital assets, like Bitcoin, to be money.
But he has said stablecoins—assets pegged to fiat currencies though different to CBDCs—could become an important part of the future financial landscape.
For more blockchain news, please download WikiBit- the Global Blockchain Regulatory Inquiry APP.
A South Korean regulatory chief has renewed calls for stronger CRYPTO sector policing, but an industry association has warned that billions of USD worth of damages could follow if crypto-only exchanges are allowed to go bust.To get more news about ETH, you can visit wikibit.com official website.
According to Seoul Finance, the new Financial Services Commission (FSC) Chairman Koh Seung-beom announced that he would seek to “strengthen the monitoring of crypto exchanges” to ensure that they return customer deposits in a timely manner and follow other regulatory protocols.
Koh was speaking to reporters after meeting with the heads of eight policy and financial institutions at Seoul, where he discussed crypto and other matters.
Koh was quoted as stating:
“The Financial Intelligence Unit [a regulatory agency that answers to the FSC] cryptoasset-related labor resources have been increased and a cryptoasset inspection department has been established. We will check with the FIU to see if we are on the right track.”
But the industry is doing what it can to push back against regulatory policies that have seen all but four of South Korea‘s crypto exchanges close or limit their services to crypto-only operations in the past few days. News1 quoted the head of the Korea Blockchain Enterprise Promotion Association as urging politicians to support a private member’s bill in parliament that would seek to unpick the current regulations and open the door for crypto exchanges that have no bank affiliations to offer fiat KRW trading.
The association was quoted as stating that the government and regulators had ignored the will of the “National Assembly, industry experts and the media,” allowing only “large corporations” to offer crypto exchange services.
It added that it was a “bitter pill to swallow for the ”39 medium-sized exchanges who had also invested billions of KRW to build various systems and to obtain information security management system certification – only to be told they had to switch to crypto-only business.
Trading figures have shriveled at most non-big four exchanges in the days following last weeks regulatory deadline.
Allowing these exchanges to go out of business could compromise the holdings of up to USD 8.4bn worth of customer funds, the association warned.
Meanwhile, across the sea to the East, Japanese regulators have been urged to limit or police peer-to-peer (P2P) crypto transactions.
Per Nikkei, legal experts have claimed that “direct [crypto] transactions between individuals have emerged as a hotbed of crime.”
The media outlet noted that the regulatory Financial Services Agency monitors transactions “through exchanges, but mainstream interpersonal transactions are not monitored.”
Experts called for a crypto fraud “deterrent,” and added that a joint “public-private sector collaboration” was “required to create, improve and spread” the “technical capabilities of tracking software.”
According to Seoul Finance, the new Financial Services Commission (FSC) Chairman Koh Seung-beom announced that he would seek to “strengthen the monitoring of crypto exchanges” to ensure that they return customer deposits in a timely manner and follow other regulatory protocols.
Koh was speaking to reporters after meeting with the heads of eight policy and financial institutions at Seoul, where he discussed crypto and other matters.
Koh was quoted as stating:
“The Financial Intelligence Unit [a regulatory agency that answers to the FSC] cryptoasset-related labor resources have been increased and a cryptoasset inspection department has been established. We will check with the FIU to see if we are on the right track.”
But the industry is doing what it can to push back against regulatory policies that have seen all but four of South Korea‘s crypto exchanges close or limit their services to crypto-only operations in the past few days. News1 quoted the head of the Korea Blockchain Enterprise Promotion Association as urging politicians to support a private member’s bill in parliament that would seek to unpick the current regulations and open the door for crypto exchanges that have no bank affiliations to offer fiat KRW trading.
The association was quoted as stating that the government and regulators had ignored the will of the “National Assembly, industry experts and the media,” allowing only “large corporations” to offer crypto exchange services.
It added that it was a “bitter pill to swallow for the ”39 medium-sized exchanges who had also invested billions of KRW to build various systems and to obtain information security management system certification – only to be told they had to switch to crypto-only business.
Trading figures have shriveled at most non-big four exchanges in the days following last weeks regulatory deadline.
Allowing these exchanges to go out of business could compromise the holdings of up to USD 8.4bn worth of customer funds, the association warned.
Meanwhile, across the sea to the East, Japanese regulators have been urged to limit or police peer-to-peer (P2P) crypto transactions.
Per Nikkei, legal experts have claimed that “direct [crypto] transactions between individuals have emerged as a hotbed of crime.”
The media outlet noted that the regulatory Financial Services Agency monitors transactions “through exchanges, but mainstream interpersonal transactions are not monitored.”
Experts called for a crypto fraud “deterrent,” and added that a joint “public-private sector collaboration” was “required to create, improve and spread” the “technical capabilities of tracking software.”
U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis took to the Senate floor on Wednesday to explain her views on a prospective U.S. central bank digital currency.To get more news about BTC, you can visit wikibit.com official website.
Highlighting the role of a CBDC in the next era of finance, Lummis said: “Americas leadership in global financial services is a heritage our country can rightly be proud of.”
The Wyoming senator went on to outline a vision for a CBDC that is a direct debt instrument with the Federal Reserve, as opposed to stablecoins, which are a claim on commercial bank money or other assets. She was especially concerned with the importance of programmability, which she highlighted as a key distinction between existing digitized versions of the dollar and a true CBDC.
“Programmability focuses on the characteristics of money, including the identity of the owner, the amount of money being transferred and the conditions in which the outside world can interact with that money,” Lummis explained. She further insisted on the importance of continued privacy, saying: “We cannot allow a CBDC to become a panopticon.”
These concerns have cropped up often in discussions of a CBDC, but this is the first time a Senator has spoken at length on a positive vision for such a development on the shared Senate floor.
A digital dollar has been the subject of a great deal of interest, especially in light of a coming report from the Federal Reserve, which Lummis mentioned as background to her remarks.
Lummis also brought up private stablecoins. Legislators and regulators, including at the Fed, have taken to presenting CBDCs and private stablecoins as likely to operate in contention. Lummis denied the comparison to “wildcat banks” of the 19th century — a comparison that Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Gary Gensler made at a hearing before the Senate Banking Committee in mid-September. She did, however, say:
“Stablecoins also present certain novel risks to the united states economy. In particular, stablecoins should be 100% backed by cash or cash equivalents and should be audited regularly.”
For more blockchain news, please download WikiBit- the Global Blockchain Regulatory Inquiry APP.
Highlighting the role of a CBDC in the next era of finance, Lummis said: “Americas leadership in global financial services is a heritage our country can rightly be proud of.”
The Wyoming senator went on to outline a vision for a CBDC that is a direct debt instrument with the Federal Reserve, as opposed to stablecoins, which are a claim on commercial bank money or other assets. She was especially concerned with the importance of programmability, which she highlighted as a key distinction between existing digitized versions of the dollar and a true CBDC.
“Programmability focuses on the characteristics of money, including the identity of the owner, the amount of money being transferred and the conditions in which the outside world can interact with that money,” Lummis explained. She further insisted on the importance of continued privacy, saying: “We cannot allow a CBDC to become a panopticon.”
These concerns have cropped up often in discussions of a CBDC, but this is the first time a Senator has spoken at length on a positive vision for such a development on the shared Senate floor.
A digital dollar has been the subject of a great deal of interest, especially in light of a coming report from the Federal Reserve, which Lummis mentioned as background to her remarks.
Lummis also brought up private stablecoins. Legislators and regulators, including at the Fed, have taken to presenting CBDCs and private stablecoins as likely to operate in contention. Lummis denied the comparison to “wildcat banks” of the 19th century — a comparison that Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Gary Gensler made at a hearing before the Senate Banking Committee in mid-September. She did, however, say:
“Stablecoins also present certain novel risks to the united states economy. In particular, stablecoins should be 100% backed by cash or cash equivalents and should be audited regularly.”
For more blockchain news, please download WikiBit- the Global Blockchain Regulatory Inquiry APP.
Archives
- All
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021