nikesasasassa's blog
Running community cheers on North Van man attempting 60
running knock off van cleef bracelet green community is cheering on a North Vancouver runnerattempting one of the world toughest endurance races this weekend.
Gary Robbins is runningthe Barkley Marathons five marathons stacked together over 60 hours in the backwoods of Tennessee after coming within hours of finishing last year. Only 14 runners have completedthe 160 km race in the 60 hour time limit over the past 31 years, climbing a total of 20,000 metres of elevation on treacherous trails inFrozen Head State Park. Robbins hopes to be the first Canadian finisher.
Robbins has the fastest known time for the West Coast Trail on Vancouver Island, as well as holding the record for the Hurt 100 in Hawaii, a 100 mile racewith a low finisher rate. In local running circles, he a legend.
The athlete with the distinctive beardkept a detailed training log on his blog through the winter. In his final month before the race, he logged 72 hours, 129,000 van cleef black bracelet fake feet of elevation, 187 miles and 28 dark chocolate bars in the local mountains.
Canadian Running magazine sent a runner to cover this weekend race. An update posted to Twitter said Robbins was well into Lap 2 (his second marathon) on Saturday afternoon.
Duringlast year race, Robbins reported having bracelet fake van cleef hallucinations after more than 50 hours on his feet with little food and sleep. He got lost a few hours before the finish and eventually had to drop out during the final lap. It begins when one of the organizers lights a cigarette. epaper, Digital Access, Subscriber Rewards), please input your Print Newspaper subscription phone number and postal code.
{ phone }
{ addressPostalCode }
By clicking "Create Account", I hearby grant permission to Postmedia to use my account information to create my account.
I also accept and agree to be bound by Postmedia's Terms and Conditions with respect to my use of the Site and I have read and understand Postmedia's Privacy Statement. epaper, Digital Access, Subscriber Rewards), please input your Print Newspaper subscription phone number and postal code.
{ phone }
{ addressPostalCode }
By clicking "Create Account", I hearby grant permission to Postmedia to use my account information to create my account.
I also accept and agree to be bound by Postmedia's Terms and Conditions with respect to my use of the Site and I have read and understand Postmedia's Privacy Statement. I consent to the collection, use, maintenance, and disclosure of my information in accordance with the Postmedia's Privacy Policy.
running knock off van cleef bracelet green community is cheering on a North Vancouver runnerattempting one of the world toughest endurance races this weekend.
Gary Robbins is runningthe Barkley Marathons five marathons stacked together over 60 hours in the backwoods of Tennessee after coming within hours of finishing last year. Only 14 runners have completedthe 160 km race in the 60 hour time limit over the past 31 years, climbing a total of 20,000 metres of elevation on treacherous trails inFrozen Head State Park. Robbins hopes to be the first Canadian finisher.
Robbins has the fastest known time for the West Coast Trail on Vancouver Island, as well as holding the record for the Hurt 100 in Hawaii, a 100 mile racewith a low finisher rate. In local running circles, he a legend.
The athlete with the distinctive beardkept a detailed training log on his blog through the winter. In his final month before the race, he logged 72 hours, 129,000 van cleef black bracelet fake feet of elevation, 187 miles and 28 dark chocolate bars in the local mountains.
Canadian Running magazine sent a runner to cover this weekend race. An update posted to Twitter said Robbins was well into Lap 2 (his second marathon) on Saturday afternoon.
Duringlast year race, Robbins reported having bracelet fake van cleef hallucinations after more than 50 hours on his feet with little food and sleep. He got lost a few hours before the finish and eventually had to drop out during the final lap. It begins when one of the organizers lights a cigarette. epaper, Digital Access, Subscriber Rewards), please input your Print Newspaper subscription phone number and postal code.
{ phone }
{ addressPostalCode }
By clicking "Create Account", I hearby grant permission to Postmedia to use my account information to create my account.
I also accept and agree to be bound by Postmedia's Terms and Conditions with respect to my use of the Site and I have read and understand Postmedia's Privacy Statement. epaper, Digital Access, Subscriber Rewards), please input your Print Newspaper subscription phone number and postal code.
{ phone }
{ addressPostalCode }
By clicking "Create Account", I hearby grant permission to Postmedia to use my account information to create my account.
I also accept and agree to be bound by Postmedia's Terms and Conditions with respect to my use of the Site and I have read and understand Postmedia's Privacy Statement. I consent to the collection, use, maintenance, and disclosure of my information in accordance with the Postmedia's Privacy Policy.
- van cleef arpels necklace fortunate couple fake give you the wedding more happiness
- embellish van cleef and arpels pendant clover lover fake Let you marriage still further happy
- style fake van cleef diamonds bracelet price?
- spirit fake VCA diamond ring do you want it?
- wearing van cleef bracelet fortunate man knockoff Make matrimony more well-being
Shell eyes new Brazilian assets ahead of BG deal
Despite a broad drive to cut spending in the face of persistently low oil prices, Chief Executive Ben Van Beurden remains steadfast in his plans to buy BG, which will transform Shell into the world's biggest liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplier.The company has announced plans to sell around $30 billion in assets between 2016 and 2018 to improve its balance sheet and focus on its core deepwater oil and LNG business.The BG deal will make Shell the largest foreign investor in Brazil's coveted deepwater oil fields.Shell, which expects oil prices to return to $90 a barrel by the end of the decade, is also looking at acquisitions in other future key regions including East Africa, which has huge reserves and where BG is developing several gas fields in Tanzania, the sources said.Any new spending, van cleef black bracelet fake however, is likely to raise eyebrows among investors already worried about Shell's ability to complete the BG deal as the industry faces one of its worst downturns in decades. Chief Financial Officer, Simon Henry, acknowledged in April that while Shell would look at assets, it did not have "a lot of cash left to be doing much more" on acquisitions.Van Beurden says spending will be selective."We will be doing quite a bit of portfolio high grading on the back of the BG deal and it doesn't necessarily mean getting out of stuff. It may also mean selectively deepening in areas where we can continue to build on our strengths," van Beurden told reporters last week."You always look at whether a portfolio is deepening positions in areas or whether it is disposing knock off van cleef new bracelet of positions that are due for restructuring or where we don't see the strategic fit any more. That hasn't changed on the back of the BG deal."A Shell spokesman said the company does not comment on specific portfolio activity.Brazil's huge deepwater oil reserves are set to become a key source for meeting growing global demand over the next few decades.Shell and BG's combined oil production in Brazil is expected to reach 550,000 barrels per day by the end of the decade, from around 200,000 bpd at present, and will account for around 20 van cleef flower bracelet fake percent of the company's global production.In the face of its share price slump, Shell used last month's quarterly results to outline a 20 percent cut in spending this year, or capex, to $30 billion and billions of dollars in cost savings to boost the balance sheet.It plans to increase borrowing levels and has indicated it will significantly reduce planned 2016 capex for the combined group after completion of the deal, expected early next year.
Despite a broad drive to cut spending in the face of persistently low oil prices, Chief Executive Ben Van Beurden remains steadfast in his plans to buy BG, which will transform Shell into the world's biggest liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplier.The company has announced plans to sell around $30 billion in assets between 2016 and 2018 to improve its balance sheet and focus on its core deepwater oil and LNG business.The BG deal will make Shell the largest foreign investor in Brazil's coveted deepwater oil fields.Shell, which expects oil prices to return to $90 a barrel by the end of the decade, is also looking at acquisitions in other future key regions including East Africa, which has huge reserves and where BG is developing several gas fields in Tanzania, the sources said.Any new spending, van cleef black bracelet fake however, is likely to raise eyebrows among investors already worried about Shell's ability to complete the BG deal as the industry faces one of its worst downturns in decades. Chief Financial Officer, Simon Henry, acknowledged in April that while Shell would look at assets, it did not have "a lot of cash left to be doing much more" on acquisitions.Van Beurden says spending will be selective."We will be doing quite a bit of portfolio high grading on the back of the BG deal and it doesn't necessarily mean getting out of stuff. It may also mean selectively deepening in areas where we can continue to build on our strengths," van Beurden told reporters last week."You always look at whether a portfolio is deepening positions in areas or whether it is disposing knock off van cleef new bracelet of positions that are due for restructuring or where we don't see the strategic fit any more. That hasn't changed on the back of the BG deal."A Shell spokesman said the company does not comment on specific portfolio activity.Brazil's huge deepwater oil reserves are set to become a key source for meeting growing global demand over the next few decades.Shell and BG's combined oil production in Brazil is expected to reach 550,000 barrels per day by the end of the decade, from around 200,000 bpd at present, and will account for around 20 van cleef flower bracelet fake percent of the company's global production.In the face of its share price slump, Shell used last month's quarterly results to outline a 20 percent cut in spending this year, or capex, to $30 billion and billions of dollars in cost savings to boost the balance sheet.It plans to increase borrowing levels and has indicated it will significantly reduce planned 2016 capex for the combined group after completion of the deal, expected early next year.
The life and death of Vincent van Gogh
The following script is from "The Life and Death of Vincent van Gogh" which originally aired on Oct. 16, 2011 and was rebroadcast on July 29, 2012. Morley Safer is the correspondent. David Browning, producer.
Tonight, once again, we offer a rare visual treat: a look into the life and death of that troubled giant of a painter, Vincent van Gogh, whose death occurred 122 years ago tonight.
A biography published last year challenged a crucial part of the van Gogh legend.
Their story rambles from van Gogh's birthplace in Holland to Paris, rural France, and to South Carolina. Much of our report is magnificently illustrated by the artist himself.
Here, outside the village of Auvers in the French countryside he loved, on the very edge of the wheat fields he painted so vividly here, lies Vincent van Gogh. Alongside his devoted brother, Theo.
Morley Safer: No soaring memorials. It's just these simple headstones.
Steven Naifeh: Yeah, it couldn't be more moving knowing that Vincent spent most of his adult life wanting to be with Theo. And to have them spend eternity lying next to each other is seriously touching. Tens of thousands of them come every year.
Naifeh: Japanese visitors actually bring the ashes of their ancestors to pour on the grave of the painter of "Starry Night." Russian visitors bring vodka to pour on the grave.
These South Koreans brought music
[Visitor with iPhone: "On that starry, starry night you took your life."]
Don Mclean's famous anthem to Vincent: an artist largely ignored in his lifetime, even ridiculed by the art establishment. Whose paintings are now valued in the hundreds of millions of dollars and command center stage at the great museums of the world.
Naifeh: The colors are beautiful and they're bright and they're cheerful. And if it's a bowl of flowers, it's an exuberant bowl of irises or roses. If it's a landscape, it's all the beauty of the natural world washing over you. You don't have to have a degree in art history to understand that message.
At the Musee d'Orsay in Paris we talked of art and madness. Sitting by one of van Gogh's iconic self portraits, painted in 1889 at Saint Paul, a clinic for the insane in Saint Remy, where he had himself committed for a year. Some other masterworks done at Saint Remy: irises. Cypresses. And "Starry Night."
Naifeh: Whether it's "Starry Night," with all that swirling sky, or the swirling brushstrokes in this painting, there are people who have said that this was a depiction of the craziness emanating from his mind. I don't think he's trying that at all. These beautiful, exquisitely colored blue brush strokes are really creating a pattern of unity and harmony and beauty.
Within the madness, copy butterfly van cleef necklace there was genius.
Naifeh: Vincent was enormously proud that he painted this entire painting in less than an hour. About 45 minutes.
He worked so quickly that in nine years, he turned out more than a thousand paintings and another thousand drawings.
Naifeh: These are not just crazy works of art by a crazy painter. They are intentional masterpieces by somebody who knew exactly what they're doing.
For ten years, Steve Naifeh and his partner Greg Smith who's recovering from cancer surgery peered into every dark corner of Vincent van Gogh's life. He was laughed out of art school. Couldn't hold a job. And even tried being a minister, like his father, with disastrous results.
Safer: He was a wanderer, a kind of constant pilgrim.
Smith: He couldn't find a niche anywhere. Even when he was working for an evangelical church, they found his behavior too weird. And so they just van cleef copy alhambra necklace kicked him out.
From childhood, he replica sweet alhambra necklace was haunted by inner demons. Argumentative. Given to strange outbursts. A social misfit.
The following script is from "The Life and Death of Vincent van Gogh" which originally aired on Oct. 16, 2011 and was rebroadcast on July 29, 2012. Morley Safer is the correspondent. David Browning, producer.
Tonight, once again, we offer a rare visual treat: a look into the life and death of that troubled giant of a painter, Vincent van Gogh, whose death occurred 122 years ago tonight.
A biography published last year challenged a crucial part of the van Gogh legend.
Their story rambles from van Gogh's birthplace in Holland to Paris, rural France, and to South Carolina. Much of our report is magnificently illustrated by the artist himself.
Here, outside the village of Auvers in the French countryside he loved, on the very edge of the wheat fields he painted so vividly here, lies Vincent van Gogh. Alongside his devoted brother, Theo.
Morley Safer: No soaring memorials. It's just these simple headstones.
Steven Naifeh: Yeah, it couldn't be more moving knowing that Vincent spent most of his adult life wanting to be with Theo. And to have them spend eternity lying next to each other is seriously touching. Tens of thousands of them come every year.
Naifeh: Japanese visitors actually bring the ashes of their ancestors to pour on the grave of the painter of "Starry Night." Russian visitors bring vodka to pour on the grave.
These South Koreans brought music
[Visitor with iPhone: "On that starry, starry night you took your life."]
Don Mclean's famous anthem to Vincent: an artist largely ignored in his lifetime, even ridiculed by the art establishment. Whose paintings are now valued in the hundreds of millions of dollars and command center stage at the great museums of the world.
Naifeh: The colors are beautiful and they're bright and they're cheerful. And if it's a bowl of flowers, it's an exuberant bowl of irises or roses. If it's a landscape, it's all the beauty of the natural world washing over you. You don't have to have a degree in art history to understand that message.
At the Musee d'Orsay in Paris we talked of art and madness. Sitting by one of van Gogh's iconic self portraits, painted in 1889 at Saint Paul, a clinic for the insane in Saint Remy, where he had himself committed for a year. Some other masterworks done at Saint Remy: irises. Cypresses. And "Starry Night."
Naifeh: Whether it's "Starry Night," with all that swirling sky, or the swirling brushstrokes in this painting, there are people who have said that this was a depiction of the craziness emanating from his mind. I don't think he's trying that at all. These beautiful, exquisitely colored blue brush strokes are really creating a pattern of unity and harmony and beauty.
Within the madness, copy butterfly van cleef necklace there was genius.
Naifeh: Vincent was enormously proud that he painted this entire painting in less than an hour. About 45 minutes.
He worked so quickly that in nine years, he turned out more than a thousand paintings and another thousand drawings.
Naifeh: These are not just crazy works of art by a crazy painter. They are intentional masterpieces by somebody who knew exactly what they're doing.
For ten years, Steve Naifeh and his partner Greg Smith who's recovering from cancer surgery peered into every dark corner of Vincent van Gogh's life. He was laughed out of art school. Couldn't hold a job. And even tried being a minister, like his father, with disastrous results.
Safer: He was a wanderer, a kind of constant pilgrim.
Smith: He couldn't find a niche anywhere. Even when he was working for an evangelical church, they found his behavior too weird. And so they just van cleef copy alhambra necklace kicked him out.
From childhood, he replica sweet alhambra necklace was haunted by inner demons. Argumentative. Given to strange outbursts. A social misfit.
- popular copy VCA with diamonds necklace do you want it?
- wearing vac bracelets fortunate woman replica Let you matrimony all fragrant
- decorate arpels van cleef bracelets lucky couple replica make you matrimony to a
- ornament van cleef & arpels ring fortunate men knockoff make
- van bracelet lucky man copy offer espousal still further bliss
The Joys of Owning Real Estate van cleef pink necklace knock off on Bird Key
If you're looking for a perfect home on Florida's Gulf Coast, don't overlook beautiful Bird Key, one of the most exclusive residential communities anywhere.
Bird Key is a majestic barrier island in Sarasota Bay, 250 beautifully sculpted acres of the most magnificent van cleef arpels copy alhambra necklace homes on the coast. Bird Key is a tranquil community connected to downtown Sarasota by the John Ringling Causeway Bridge. And unlike the other nearby islands, high rise condominiums can't be found on Bird Key. It's all single family homes.
Bird Key sits in the center of everything, only minutes from beaches and world class shopping and dining. Yet Bird Key's quiet, tucked away ambience assures that this exclusive enclave of homes remains serene and unpretentious.
To call Bird Key a boater delight is an understatement. Many of the island's homes sit directly on Sarasota Bay or on the deep water canals. Boaters enjoy extra wide waterways and quick, easy access to the Gulf of Mexico. Legendary circus entrepreneur John Ringling completed the first home built on Bird Key; that magnificent structure is today the Bird Key fake van cleef mini necklace Yacht Club, one of the most esteemed clubs in Florida. The Club offers members an exceptional list of amenities as well as docking services with reciprocal agreements at the area's other yacht clubs. Sailors will appreciate that Bird Key is also only minutes from the Sarasota Yacht Club and the Sarasota Sailing Squadron.
Of course, Bird Key residents enjoy all the marvelous benefits of Sarasota living: superior fishing and water sports, dozens of golf and tennis options, stunning natural beauty, sparkling white beaches, a variety of intriguing music and art festivals, and leading cultural venues like the historic Asolo Theatre and Van Wezel Hall. The average year round temperature is 73 degrees, and the long summer days are punctuated by cool breezes drifting in from the Gulf.
With today's low home prices and the absolute lowest interest rates ever, there's no time like now to discover your perfect home on Florida's majestic Bird Key.
For more information on buying real estate on Bird Key, contact your Exclusive Buyer Agents at True Sarasota Real Estate.
I have been in the real estate industry for over 15 years. In that time I have started and still run True Real Estate, Sarasota real estate's exclusive buyer agents. I have earned more real estate designations, 16 to date, then any other agent or broker on the entire east coast of the United States. In the daily workings of day to day real estate, I have learned and written about every topic that deals with real estate, market rates, green housing and loans and so much more as well as human interest pieces, location aware pieces and attractions in Sarasota.
If you're looking for a perfect home on Florida's Gulf Coast, don't overlook beautiful Bird Key, one of the most exclusive residential communities anywhere.
Bird Key is a majestic barrier island in Sarasota Bay, 250 beautifully sculpted acres of the most magnificent van cleef arpels copy alhambra necklace homes on the coast. Bird Key is a tranquil community connected to downtown Sarasota by the John Ringling Causeway Bridge. And unlike the other nearby islands, high rise condominiums can't be found on Bird Key. It's all single family homes.
Bird Key sits in the center of everything, only minutes from beaches and world class shopping and dining. Yet Bird Key's quiet, tucked away ambience assures that this exclusive enclave of homes remains serene and unpretentious.
To call Bird Key a boater delight is an understatement. Many of the island's homes sit directly on Sarasota Bay or on the deep water canals. Boaters enjoy extra wide waterways and quick, easy access to the Gulf of Mexico. Legendary circus entrepreneur John Ringling completed the first home built on Bird Key; that magnificent structure is today the Bird Key fake van cleef mini necklace Yacht Club, one of the most esteemed clubs in Florida. The Club offers members an exceptional list of amenities as well as docking services with reciprocal agreements at the area's other yacht clubs. Sailors will appreciate that Bird Key is also only minutes from the Sarasota Yacht Club and the Sarasota Sailing Squadron.
Of course, Bird Key residents enjoy all the marvelous benefits of Sarasota living: superior fishing and water sports, dozens of golf and tennis options, stunning natural beauty, sparkling white beaches, a variety of intriguing music and art festivals, and leading cultural venues like the historic Asolo Theatre and Van Wezel Hall. The average year round temperature is 73 degrees, and the long summer days are punctuated by cool breezes drifting in from the Gulf.
With today's low home prices and the absolute lowest interest rates ever, there's no time like now to discover your perfect home on Florida's majestic Bird Key.
For more information on buying real estate on Bird Key, contact your Exclusive Buyer Agents at True Sarasota Real Estate.
I have been in the real estate industry for over 15 years. In that time I have started and still run True Real Estate, Sarasota real estate's exclusive buyer agents. I have earned more real estate designations, 16 to date, then any other agent or broker on the entire east coast of the United States. In the daily workings of day to day real estate, I have learned and written about every topic that deals with real estate, market rates, green housing and loans and so much more as well as human interest pieces, location aware pieces and attractions in Sarasota.
- adorn van cleef bracelets lucky man knockoff give ground marriage to a higher degree well-being
- wearing van arpels bracelet lucky couple fake make you the wedding all fine
- love fake VCA of diamonds jewelry price?
- love magic van cleef rose earring price?
- decorate van and arpels pendant alhambra women copy make you espousal all goodliness
Stephen named as the national hockey coach
KUALA LUMPUR: Talk fake vans necklace about a belated birthday present!
Stephen van Huizen, who turned 56 on Sept 1, received a pleasant surprise on Monday he was named as coach of the men national hockey team, replacing Tai Beng Hai.
MHC technical director Terry Walsh said that Stephen was chosen of his vast experience guided Malaysia to the 2000 Sydney Olympics and also helped the national team win their first ever Asian Games silver medal in Guangzhou in 2010, said the Australian.
believe that Stephen and Lim can work together to take the national hockey team on the right direction and achieve the desired results.
mission is to help Malaysia qualify for the 2018 World Cup in New Delhi. That his KPI (key performance index). who has more than 20 years coaching experience and who was the manager of the replica vans necklace Malaysian team who finished a disappointing sixth in the World League Semi Finals in Antwerp, Belgium, in June, described the appointment as great honour also a huge responsibility for me to build a strong team. I was disappointed that the team failed to qualify for next year Olympics, said Stephen.
will focus more on the physical aspect of the players and also on their mental strength . I need to have players with a winning attitude.
support from the MHC and Walsh, I do my best to help the national team get back on the right track. also announced that Beng Hai has been appointed as the development programme director while A. Arulselvaraj will continue van cleef imitation butterfly necklace to be in charge of the National Juniors, who are preparing for next year Junior World Cup in New Delhi.
KUALA LUMPUR: Talk fake vans necklace about a belated birthday present!
Stephen van Huizen, who turned 56 on Sept 1, received a pleasant surprise on Monday he was named as coach of the men national hockey team, replacing Tai Beng Hai.
MHC technical director Terry Walsh said that Stephen was chosen of his vast experience guided Malaysia to the 2000 Sydney Olympics and also helped the national team win their first ever Asian Games silver medal in Guangzhou in 2010, said the Australian.
believe that Stephen and Lim can work together to take the national hockey team on the right direction and achieve the desired results.
mission is to help Malaysia qualify for the 2018 World Cup in New Delhi. That his KPI (key performance index). who has more than 20 years coaching experience and who was the manager of the replica vans necklace Malaysian team who finished a disappointing sixth in the World League Semi Finals in Antwerp, Belgium, in June, described the appointment as great honour also a huge responsibility for me to build a strong team. I was disappointed that the team failed to qualify for next year Olympics, said Stephen.
will focus more on the physical aspect of the players and also on their mental strength . I need to have players with a winning attitude.
support from the MHC and Walsh, I do my best to help the national team get back on the right track. also announced that Beng Hai has been appointed as the development programme director while A. Arulselvaraj will continue van cleef imitation butterfly necklace to be in charge of the National Juniors, who are preparing for next year Junior World Cup in New Delhi.
- through van cleef arpels necklace fortunate lover fake give ground ceremony all fragrant
- unique imitation van cleef & arpels with diamonds
- Put on vac rings clover man imitation offer matrim
- ornament van and arpels bracelet clover couple imitation make you ceremony more happy
- unique copy van cleef white gold pendant How much it?
Talkbacks Israeli scientists shoot for the moon with dishwasher
Martin arpels van cleef necklace fake Cooper was born to Ukrainian Jews in USA the inventor of the cell phone, and Alan Turing cracked the Enigma Code not a Pole. And van cleef alhambra necklace fake several Israeli Nobel Prize Winners were born in Israel: Aaron Ciechanover, Daniel Kahneman, Dan Shechtman, Ariel Warshel and Ada Yonath.If Jewish Nobel Prize Winners in Poland, Russia, UK, Germany, France, USA and elsewhere have "stolen" the knowledge, then SURELY there MUST be EVIDENCE that someone else came up with these inventions? Right? So where's the evidence? Why hasn't anyone spoken out about it?If you don't answer my questions, if you change the subject as you usually do, I will ask the questions again. You state your hatred for Jews and your excuses for hating Jews not the reasons for hating Jews.Martin Cooper, another long lost but digged out of closet by hasbara peddlers Jewish son ;) Martin Cooper was born to Ukrainian parents Arthur and Mary Cooper. Not much is known about Cooper's parents except that they were from Ukraine according to their son, Ukrainians or maybe Polish considering that 1/2 of today's Ukraine was Polish for couple of centuries prior to partition and 1/3 after WWI but unlike you I won't insist on it. His mother's name Mary (Maria) is very popular among Ukrainians and Poles and hardly known as the name of Jewish girl, his father's name Arthur hardly recognised among Jews ,.About Enigma, google "Polish Broke German Codes:" or "Cryptanalysis of the Enigma" and knock yourself out.In regard of Israeli Nobel prize laureates. Read more carefully "not one for a Jew born, educated or for his/her work in Israel despite that Israel exist for 65 years and an average prize winner age is under 50 yo" ,.Google was founded not invented."as a research project by Larry Page and Sergey Brin when they were both alhambra style necklace copy PhD students at Stanford University in Stanford, California", that's how they introduce themselves without any mention to be Jewish, that's how it should be recognised and respected not the way you want. It's military version predecessor was operational before Page and Brim were born but how the hell would you know, you're here to peddle your hasbara crap not to deal with facts or educate yourself ,.Manitoba processor? Are you sure you didn't mean Manitoba Kosher Meat Processor? Manitoba was a system on a chip introduced by Intel Corporation in 2003. It was a total failure in the attempt by Intel to break into the smart phones market ,. Centrino, a mainboard chipset, mobile CPU and wireless network interface in the design of a laptop. Another Intel product. Last time I checked Intel was US corporation headquartered in Santa Clara, California. Anything invented in Intel's labs is intel's property, not Jewish ,.Page and Brim are Jews, Kaganowich, Yagoda are Commies How convenient ;) ,.Try to spend more time doing your homework and less on running your mouth ,.It was faked, and the greatest hoax,,,just beaten by Islamic cult ideology.Belgium receive a gift from the NASA, which actually was analyzed and came out (the year of 2006), as petrified wood. (collected from the south pole by von Brown in 1968.)"Rijksmuseum spokeswoman Xandra van Gelder, who oversaw the investigation that proved the piece was a fake, said the museum will keep it anyway as a curiosity."
Martin arpels van cleef necklace fake Cooper was born to Ukrainian Jews in USA the inventor of the cell phone, and Alan Turing cracked the Enigma Code not a Pole. And van cleef alhambra necklace fake several Israeli Nobel Prize Winners were born in Israel: Aaron Ciechanover, Daniel Kahneman, Dan Shechtman, Ariel Warshel and Ada Yonath.If Jewish Nobel Prize Winners in Poland, Russia, UK, Germany, France, USA and elsewhere have "stolen" the knowledge, then SURELY there MUST be EVIDENCE that someone else came up with these inventions? Right? So where's the evidence? Why hasn't anyone spoken out about it?If you don't answer my questions, if you change the subject as you usually do, I will ask the questions again. You state your hatred for Jews and your excuses for hating Jews not the reasons for hating Jews.Martin Cooper, another long lost but digged out of closet by hasbara peddlers Jewish son ;) Martin Cooper was born to Ukrainian parents Arthur and Mary Cooper. Not much is known about Cooper's parents except that they were from Ukraine according to their son, Ukrainians or maybe Polish considering that 1/2 of today's Ukraine was Polish for couple of centuries prior to partition and 1/3 after WWI but unlike you I won't insist on it. His mother's name Mary (Maria) is very popular among Ukrainians and Poles and hardly known as the name of Jewish girl, his father's name Arthur hardly recognised among Jews ,.About Enigma, google "Polish Broke German Codes:" or "Cryptanalysis of the Enigma" and knock yourself out.In regard of Israeli Nobel prize laureates. Read more carefully "not one for a Jew born, educated or for his/her work in Israel despite that Israel exist for 65 years and an average prize winner age is under 50 yo" ,.Google was founded not invented."as a research project by Larry Page and Sergey Brin when they were both alhambra style necklace copy PhD students at Stanford University in Stanford, California", that's how they introduce themselves without any mention to be Jewish, that's how it should be recognised and respected not the way you want. It's military version predecessor was operational before Page and Brim were born but how the hell would you know, you're here to peddle your hasbara crap not to deal with facts or educate yourself ,.Manitoba processor? Are you sure you didn't mean Manitoba Kosher Meat Processor? Manitoba was a system on a chip introduced by Intel Corporation in 2003. It was a total failure in the attempt by Intel to break into the smart phones market ,. Centrino, a mainboard chipset, mobile CPU and wireless network interface in the design of a laptop. Another Intel product. Last time I checked Intel was US corporation headquartered in Santa Clara, California. Anything invented in Intel's labs is intel's property, not Jewish ,.Page and Brim are Jews, Kaganowich, Yagoda are Commies How convenient ;) ,.Try to spend more time doing your homework and less on running your mouth ,.It was faked, and the greatest hoax,,,just beaten by Islamic cult ideology.Belgium receive a gift from the NASA, which actually was analyzed and came out (the year of 2006), as petrified wood. (collected from the south pole by von Brown in 1968.)"Rijksmuseum spokeswoman Xandra van Gelder, who oversaw the investigation that proved the piece was a fake, said the museum will keep it anyway as a curiosity."
- van cleef and arpels earrings trefoil woman knockoff give you ceremony more fra
- adorn van cleef pendant fortunate couple imitation Let you matrimonial a fortiori bliss
- love fake VCA pink gold bracelet How much it?
- ornament van cleef earrings alhambra couple fake offer the wedding more goodliness
- Put on van cleef and arpels bracelet lucky men replica Make wedding still fragrant
The end of the line for California automaking
LOS ANGELES AND FREMONT, CALIF. Toyota Motor Corp.'s decision to abandon its assembly line in Fremont marks the end of large scale auto manufacturing replica van cleef arpels engagement ring in California, which over the years boasted a dozen or more plants building vehicles ranging from Studebakers to Camaro muscle cars.
The Japanese automaker said Thursday that it would end production at the plant March 31, throwing 4,700 people out of work, and return some production to Japan.
It's another hard blow replica van cleef & arpels ring price for California, a state already grappling with an 11.9% unemployment rate its highest since World War II and the fourth worst in the nation.
In addition to wiping out the jobs directly tied to the plant, closing the facility will send ripples through the web of suppliers that make components for the factory and through nearby stores, restaurants and bars that depend on its workers for business.
Overall, closing the plant could cost more than 40,000 jobs, according to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D Calif.), who has worked with other public officials to try to keep the plant open. But communications with Toyota eventually broke down, she said.
Operated as a joint venture between Toyota and the former General Motors Corp. since 1984, the plant saw its future put in doubt last month when GM pulled out of the arrangement as part of its bankruptcy reorganization.
Executives of the venture, New United Motor Manufacturing Inc., told union members Thursday morning about Toyota's decision. It is the first time that Toyota has ever closed a major auto assembly plant.
Assembly line worker Jose Hernandez, 40, who commutes 75 miles to the plant from the Central Valley town of Ceres, said the news was a bit surprising because the plant had been busy since the government's "cash for clunkers" program jump started auto sales this month.
"What can I do, look for a job, which is going to be very difficult right now?" he asked.
End of an era
Shutting down the plant will be another milepost in the long erosion of California's once thriving auto industry a decline that is being only partly offset by the rise of a new breed of start up car companies specializing in such advanced technology as all electric drivetrains.
The old plants with their union payrolls provided a vital boost into the middle class for many Californians.
"The auto industry was very important in this state," said Jack Kyser, economist for the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp. "You could be a less than stellar student in high school and go to work on an assembly line, and pretty soon you were making good wages with good benefits."
Many of the shuttered plants were either bulldozed or converted into shopping malls, where paychecks for retail clerks typically are much skimpier. The old GM plant in Van Nuys is now a shopping center anchored by Home Depot, for instance, and a Samson Tire Rubber factory in City of Commerce was turned into the Citadel mall.
Analysts say those better paying union jobs, along with other costs of doing business in California, are big reasons that California's auto production has fled overseas or to other, lower cost states. auto plant with a union workforce. beginning in the 1980s, they often have opted for states such as Kentucky, Texas and Alabama, where union shops are more rare.
"It just made sense for Toyota to pull the plug," said Dennis Virag, president of the Automotive Consulting Group in Ann Arbor, Mich. "When you look at states like Kentucky and Tennessee, California just isn't competitive in manufacturing with its taxes, regulations and overall cost of doing business."
The costs apparently outweighed a package of incentives put together by state and local officials in an effort to persuade Toyota to stay in Fremont. The incentives included tax breaks, lower utility rates and publicly funded road and rail improvements around the plant, according to Feinstein.
State Sen. It also said that producing cars at Fremont wasn't "economically viable" given the current auto market, the worst in decades. The automaker, which reported its largest ever annual loss this year, has been cutting production in Japan and elsewhere amid falling sales.
Atsushi Niimi, a Toyota executive vice president, said the replica van cleef and arpels engagement ring price union presence didn't influence the decision to close the plant. But he acknowledged that "California's cost of living is relatively high, which leads to higher labor costs compared to other regions."
LOS ANGELES AND FREMONT, CALIF. Toyota Motor Corp.'s decision to abandon its assembly line in Fremont marks the end of large scale auto manufacturing replica van cleef arpels engagement ring in California, which over the years boasted a dozen or more plants building vehicles ranging from Studebakers to Camaro muscle cars.
The Japanese automaker said Thursday that it would end production at the plant March 31, throwing 4,700 people out of work, and return some production to Japan.
It's another hard blow replica van cleef & arpels ring price for California, a state already grappling with an 11.9% unemployment rate its highest since World War II and the fourth worst in the nation.
In addition to wiping out the jobs directly tied to the plant, closing the facility will send ripples through the web of suppliers that make components for the factory and through nearby stores, restaurants and bars that depend on its workers for business.
Overall, closing the plant could cost more than 40,000 jobs, according to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D Calif.), who has worked with other public officials to try to keep the plant open. But communications with Toyota eventually broke down, she said.
Operated as a joint venture between Toyota and the former General Motors Corp. since 1984, the plant saw its future put in doubt last month when GM pulled out of the arrangement as part of its bankruptcy reorganization.
Executives of the venture, New United Motor Manufacturing Inc., told union members Thursday morning about Toyota's decision. It is the first time that Toyota has ever closed a major auto assembly plant.
Assembly line worker Jose Hernandez, 40, who commutes 75 miles to the plant from the Central Valley town of Ceres, said the news was a bit surprising because the plant had been busy since the government's "cash for clunkers" program jump started auto sales this month.
"What can I do, look for a job, which is going to be very difficult right now?" he asked.
End of an era
Shutting down the plant will be another milepost in the long erosion of California's once thriving auto industry a decline that is being only partly offset by the rise of a new breed of start up car companies specializing in such advanced technology as all electric drivetrains.
The old plants with their union payrolls provided a vital boost into the middle class for many Californians.
"The auto industry was very important in this state," said Jack Kyser, economist for the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp. "You could be a less than stellar student in high school and go to work on an assembly line, and pretty soon you were making good wages with good benefits."
Many of the shuttered plants were either bulldozed or converted into shopping malls, where paychecks for retail clerks typically are much skimpier. The old GM plant in Van Nuys is now a shopping center anchored by Home Depot, for instance, and a Samson Tire Rubber factory in City of Commerce was turned into the Citadel mall.
Analysts say those better paying union jobs, along with other costs of doing business in California, are big reasons that California's auto production has fled overseas or to other, lower cost states. auto plant with a union workforce. beginning in the 1980s, they often have opted for states such as Kentucky, Texas and Alabama, where union shops are more rare.
"It just made sense for Toyota to pull the plug," said Dennis Virag, president of the Automotive Consulting Group in Ann Arbor, Mich. "When you look at states like Kentucky and Tennessee, California just isn't competitive in manufacturing with its taxes, regulations and overall cost of doing business."
The costs apparently outweighed a package of incentives put together by state and local officials in an effort to persuade Toyota to stay in Fremont. The incentives included tax breaks, lower utility rates and publicly funded road and rail improvements around the plant, according to Feinstein.
State Sen. It also said that producing cars at Fremont wasn't "economically viable" given the current auto market, the worst in decades. The automaker, which reported its largest ever annual loss this year, has been cutting production in Japan and elsewhere amid falling sales.
Atsushi Niimi, a Toyota executive vice president, said the replica van cleef and arpels engagement ring price union presence didn't influence the decision to close the plant. But he acknowledged that "California's cost of living is relatively high, which leads to higher labor costs compared to other regions."
- ornament van arpels bracelet alhambra couple imitation make you the wedding all well-being
- decorate van arpels bracelets trefoil women copy Make ceremony more fragrant
- unique replica VCA white necklace price?
- spirit fake van cleef diamond bracelet do you want it?
- through arpels van cleef pendant clover lover fake
The code ahead
Simon Singh is not a man to shirk a challenge. In 1997 he replica van cleef wedding ring set out to make a documentary about the solving of the world most famous (some would say infamous) mathematical problem, Fermat Last Theorem. Having bamboozled the planet finest mathematical minds for 350 years, Fermat challenge had finally been laid to rest by the retiring English mathematician Andrew Wiles. The solution, which took up more than 1,000 pages of densely packed equations, cut a swath through some of the most fiendishly difficult areas in all of math. How on earth could this be presented to a television audience? The marvel is that despite the impenetrability of the math, Singh produced an immensely human and poignant film seen in the United States on the PBS series He later turned the subject into the bestselling book Enigma, which, he tells me, he wrote as an exercise just to see if he could.
Trained as a particle physicist at Cambridge University his research topic was the elusive quark Singh spent several years working at the European Center for Particle Physics (CERN) before swapping a life in the lab for one behind the camera at the BBC science department. Who could be better, then, to tackle the subject of cryptography? In his recently published Code Book, Singh follows the development of secret codes from ancient Rome to the latest advances in quantum cryptography. At the end of the book he invites readers to test their own code breaking skills with a forbidding looking cipher challenge. The first person to crack all 10 codes will be rewarded with a prize of $15,000 from Singh own purse.
It strikes me that there is a continuity between your two books solving Fermat Last Theorem was like cracking a huge mathematical puzzle, and that is not unlike solving a complex code.
If you look at code makers and code breakers, they driven by the same things that mathematicians are driven by. They obsessive, they love puzzles, they love conundrums. There a certain innocence about the code breaker, but at the end of the day, what the code breaker does has a major impact on wars, battles, lives, deaths and so on. Yet all that at a much higher level the political level, the military level. The actual code breaker sitting at his or her desk is a puzzle solver, so there is that in common with mathematicians.
It interesting that history is often seen as an impediment to presenting science. You get the idea from many scientists that all the really good stuff has happened in the last few years, if not last week, and that anything older is out of date and irrelevant. But in both books you put the science into a historical context, telling stories with great characters like Mary, Queen of Scots, and Charles Babbage and lots of human drama.
From a professional point of view as a scientist you always have to strip out the personal perspective. When you write up research papers it always in the passive voice: beaker was heated, not heated the beaker, and actually that replica van cleef and arpels frivole ring day I was feeling pretty good. So often it difficult for scientists to put in emotional content though there are some extraordinary exceptions who do. For me, coming from television where people will switch off if they aren engaged you have to put in the characters and emotional drama. So I write the way I make TV programs.
Is there one story that particularly stands out for you in the history of cryptography?
The story of the British discovery of public key cryptography [a form of encription technology crucial to the process of putting powerful privacy tools in public hands]. The science of secrecy is a secret science, so often cryptographic work cannot be talked about publicly, sometimes for many years. This story actually only emerged while I was writing the book, this 25 year old untold story of the greatest discovery in the history of cryptography. It turns out that some years before the Americans came up with public key encryption, British mathematicians working secretly at the GCHQ [Government Communications Headquarters] had already discovered this, but it was all hushed up because of the military significance. This was the first time these three code makers James Ellis, Clifford Cocks and Malcolm Williamson could have their story told, and I feel honored to be able to tell it. The tragedy is that Ellis died just three weeks before the announcement was made, so he never lived to see the credit he deserved.
That doesn undermine the work of the American discoveries of public key encryption. The work they did was quite independent. Furthermore, if they hadn made their breakthrough GCHQ might never have gone public, and the information age would never have been where it is replica van cleef ring replica now if we didn have this breakthrough.
Speaking of secrecy, do you think there are advances in cryptography at the moment way beyond what public knowledge?
The whole book is really about the ongoing battle between code makers and code breakers. At the moment most people would say that the code makers are clearly ahead. So it doesn really matter if people are coming up with new codes because the ones we have are already very strong. The question is whether there is someone who made a big breakthrough in code breaking that we don know about so that the assumption that there this big lead isn actually true. You can never be sure, but I think it unlikely. Although the NSA [National Security Agency] is the world largest employer of mathematicians, there are lots of brilliant mathematicians elsewhere who haven found any major new algorithms.
So in fact public knowledge at this point in time may be a real reflection of the secret knowledge, so to speak?
Yes, I think that the case.
The subtitle of the book is Evolution of Secrecy from Mary, Queen of Scots, to Quantum Cryptography, and early on you make the point that cryptography proceeds in a very Darwinian fashion with a kind of information arms race propelling developments on each side.
It is an evolutionary process, with code makers continually coming up with new developments, and then the code breakers having to respond by evolving new methods for penetrating those defenses. It is like the evolution of predator prey relationships. It interesting too because there are selection pressures. Sometimes it only when you desperate enough that new breakthroughs happen. For example, when the Germans developed the Enigma code between the wars and ultimately it was the Poles who were sandwiched between both the Germans and the Russians, and were therefore desperately worried about their national security who made the first big breakthroughs in cracking these codes. The work was then smuggled out to the British. The Poles are often forgotten in the story, but it really was extraordinary work they did, driven by this pressure of adversity.
We seem to be living at a time when there is a general obsession with codes: not just cryptographic codes, but computer codes and genetic codes we got the Human Genome Project on the verge of sequencing the entire DNA code of human beings. You also have books like Neal Stephenson
It funny, but when Enigma came out there was also Will Hunting (which was wonderful) and (which was terrible), and there were books like Man Who Loved Only Numbers [by Paul Hoffman] and Beautiful Mind [by Sylvia Nasar]. There was a whole series of math films and math books that seemed to enter popular culture at the same time. And now you have a Hollywood film like of the State with Will Smith, and last year Rising with Bruce Willis, about the NSA. Also in literature. I sure this won be the only book on codes. I not sure what triggered this.
Just one of those things that in the air. It seems to me that an interest in codes is actually pretty widespread. Children love making up codes and creating secret little languages. Lots of people love the idea of being part of some select group with its own secret passwords, like the Freemasons.
As soon as you express yourself in words, and especially once you start putting words down on paper whether it 10,000 years ago or children today there a realization that you may need to keep these things secret, whether it your personal diary or a military strategy. So it quite natural that children do this. And it empowering. One of the reasons children make codes is to hide things from their parents. To children, parents are almost like Big Brother. We worry about the CIA and the NSA; children worry about their parents. We both use codes to try and protect ourselves.
Lots of people in this country have Big Brother concerns. What do you think about these fears that the government or big corporations are spying on our lives?
If people have that concern then they should just use encryption. The great thing is that encryption is extremely strong, we think there is this big lead, so it should really protect them. The fear is what might happen if governments crack down on encryption and restrict its use. That might happen in Burma or China, but I can see it happening in the rest of the world. All the trends are in the other direction.
For the last decade there been this big debate between civil libertarians and governments and law enforcement and it been who going to win this debate. But what we now realizing is that there a third force business, who are on the side of the civil libertarians, because they want strong encryption so they can conduct their business. In France, for example, they recently lifted almost all restrictions on encryption because they didn want e mail companies going off and setting up their businesses elsewhere.
What about the argument that we need governments to be able to crack all encryption codes so they can fight crime, especially organized crime?
If governments ban encryption software it doesn really mean much. You can ban a shop from selling software, but you can ban somebody downloading it from the Internet or getting access some other way. Even if they did ban all use of such software, there are other ways of proceeding. For instance, I could use a form of steganography and hide a message in a digital image. Whatever the government is doing, people will find ways around it.
Also, the evidence that restricting encryption would help against organized crime is not enormous. If that important then you need to find other ways, like [The so called attack is a method whereby you park a van outside someone house and monitor the distinct electromagnetic signals given off as they type each computer keystroke.] Or you can send special monitoring viruses into the computers of the people you are watching. There are other technologies you can use that are being developed for these purposes.
My view is that widespread use of encryption would not increase the rate of crime. In fact restricting encryption might do the opposite. If we can encrypt our credit card details properly, that might make it easier for criminals. At the moment I don see this as a great threat to society quite the opposite. In 10 years, of course, we might have to reevaluate the whole situation.
Finally, I have to ask about your Challenge. You giving away $15,000 of your own hard earned cash to the first person who cracks all 10 codes at the back of your book. Do you expect anyone to solve it?
I think so and I be happy to give the money away. You can win $15,000 on TV from answering trivial questions, so if anyone can solve this they deserve the prize! The great thing is there such a diversity of people working on it. I recently spoke to a Field medalist who doing it. [The Field Medal is the mathematics world equivalent of the Nobel Prize.] But when I left England a few days ago, the person who was the furthest along was a 15 year old girl.
Simon Singh is not a man to shirk a challenge. In 1997 he replica van cleef wedding ring set out to make a documentary about the solving of the world most famous (some would say infamous) mathematical problem, Fermat Last Theorem. Having bamboozled the planet finest mathematical minds for 350 years, Fermat challenge had finally been laid to rest by the retiring English mathematician Andrew Wiles. The solution, which took up more than 1,000 pages of densely packed equations, cut a swath through some of the most fiendishly difficult areas in all of math. How on earth could this be presented to a television audience? The marvel is that despite the impenetrability of the math, Singh produced an immensely human and poignant film seen in the United States on the PBS series He later turned the subject into the bestselling book Enigma, which, he tells me, he wrote as an exercise just to see if he could.
Trained as a particle physicist at Cambridge University his research topic was the elusive quark Singh spent several years working at the European Center for Particle Physics (CERN) before swapping a life in the lab for one behind the camera at the BBC science department. Who could be better, then, to tackle the subject of cryptography? In his recently published Code Book, Singh follows the development of secret codes from ancient Rome to the latest advances in quantum cryptography. At the end of the book he invites readers to test their own code breaking skills with a forbidding looking cipher challenge. The first person to crack all 10 codes will be rewarded with a prize of $15,000 from Singh own purse.
It strikes me that there is a continuity between your two books solving Fermat Last Theorem was like cracking a huge mathematical puzzle, and that is not unlike solving a complex code.
If you look at code makers and code breakers, they driven by the same things that mathematicians are driven by. They obsessive, they love puzzles, they love conundrums. There a certain innocence about the code breaker, but at the end of the day, what the code breaker does has a major impact on wars, battles, lives, deaths and so on. Yet all that at a much higher level the political level, the military level. The actual code breaker sitting at his or her desk is a puzzle solver, so there is that in common with mathematicians.
It interesting that history is often seen as an impediment to presenting science. You get the idea from many scientists that all the really good stuff has happened in the last few years, if not last week, and that anything older is out of date and irrelevant. But in both books you put the science into a historical context, telling stories with great characters like Mary, Queen of Scots, and Charles Babbage and lots of human drama.
From a professional point of view as a scientist you always have to strip out the personal perspective. When you write up research papers it always in the passive voice: beaker was heated, not heated the beaker, and actually that replica van cleef and arpels frivole ring day I was feeling pretty good. So often it difficult for scientists to put in emotional content though there are some extraordinary exceptions who do. For me, coming from television where people will switch off if they aren engaged you have to put in the characters and emotional drama. So I write the way I make TV programs.
Is there one story that particularly stands out for you in the history of cryptography?
The story of the British discovery of public key cryptography [a form of encription technology crucial to the process of putting powerful privacy tools in public hands]. The science of secrecy is a secret science, so often cryptographic work cannot be talked about publicly, sometimes for many years. This story actually only emerged while I was writing the book, this 25 year old untold story of the greatest discovery in the history of cryptography. It turns out that some years before the Americans came up with public key encryption, British mathematicians working secretly at the GCHQ [Government Communications Headquarters] had already discovered this, but it was all hushed up because of the military significance. This was the first time these three code makers James Ellis, Clifford Cocks and Malcolm Williamson could have their story told, and I feel honored to be able to tell it. The tragedy is that Ellis died just three weeks before the announcement was made, so he never lived to see the credit he deserved.
That doesn undermine the work of the American discoveries of public key encryption. The work they did was quite independent. Furthermore, if they hadn made their breakthrough GCHQ might never have gone public, and the information age would never have been where it is replica van cleef ring replica now if we didn have this breakthrough.
Speaking of secrecy, do you think there are advances in cryptography at the moment way beyond what public knowledge?
The whole book is really about the ongoing battle between code makers and code breakers. At the moment most people would say that the code makers are clearly ahead. So it doesn really matter if people are coming up with new codes because the ones we have are already very strong. The question is whether there is someone who made a big breakthrough in code breaking that we don know about so that the assumption that there this big lead isn actually true. You can never be sure, but I think it unlikely. Although the NSA [National Security Agency] is the world largest employer of mathematicians, there are lots of brilliant mathematicians elsewhere who haven found any major new algorithms.
So in fact public knowledge at this point in time may be a real reflection of the secret knowledge, so to speak?
Yes, I think that the case.
The subtitle of the book is Evolution of Secrecy from Mary, Queen of Scots, to Quantum Cryptography, and early on you make the point that cryptography proceeds in a very Darwinian fashion with a kind of information arms race propelling developments on each side.
It is an evolutionary process, with code makers continually coming up with new developments, and then the code breakers having to respond by evolving new methods for penetrating those defenses. It is like the evolution of predator prey relationships. It interesting too because there are selection pressures. Sometimes it only when you desperate enough that new breakthroughs happen. For example, when the Germans developed the Enigma code between the wars and ultimately it was the Poles who were sandwiched between both the Germans and the Russians, and were therefore desperately worried about their national security who made the first big breakthroughs in cracking these codes. The work was then smuggled out to the British. The Poles are often forgotten in the story, but it really was extraordinary work they did, driven by this pressure of adversity.
We seem to be living at a time when there is a general obsession with codes: not just cryptographic codes, but computer codes and genetic codes we got the Human Genome Project on the verge of sequencing the entire DNA code of human beings. You also have books like Neal Stephenson
It funny, but when Enigma came out there was also Will Hunting (which was wonderful) and (which was terrible), and there were books like Man Who Loved Only Numbers [by Paul Hoffman] and Beautiful Mind [by Sylvia Nasar]. There was a whole series of math films and math books that seemed to enter popular culture at the same time. And now you have a Hollywood film like of the State with Will Smith, and last year Rising with Bruce Willis, about the NSA. Also in literature. I sure this won be the only book on codes. I not sure what triggered this.
Just one of those things that in the air. It seems to me that an interest in codes is actually pretty widespread. Children love making up codes and creating secret little languages. Lots of people love the idea of being part of some select group with its own secret passwords, like the Freemasons.
As soon as you express yourself in words, and especially once you start putting words down on paper whether it 10,000 years ago or children today there a realization that you may need to keep these things secret, whether it your personal diary or a military strategy. So it quite natural that children do this. And it empowering. One of the reasons children make codes is to hide things from their parents. To children, parents are almost like Big Brother. We worry about the CIA and the NSA; children worry about their parents. We both use codes to try and protect ourselves.
Lots of people in this country have Big Brother concerns. What do you think about these fears that the government or big corporations are spying on our lives?
If people have that concern then they should just use encryption. The great thing is that encryption is extremely strong, we think there is this big lead, so it should really protect them. The fear is what might happen if governments crack down on encryption and restrict its use. That might happen in Burma or China, but I can see it happening in the rest of the world. All the trends are in the other direction.
For the last decade there been this big debate between civil libertarians and governments and law enforcement and it been who going to win this debate. But what we now realizing is that there a third force business, who are on the side of the civil libertarians, because they want strong encryption so they can conduct their business. In France, for example, they recently lifted almost all restrictions on encryption because they didn want e mail companies going off and setting up their businesses elsewhere.
What about the argument that we need governments to be able to crack all encryption codes so they can fight crime, especially organized crime?
If governments ban encryption software it doesn really mean much. You can ban a shop from selling software, but you can ban somebody downloading it from the Internet or getting access some other way. Even if they did ban all use of such software, there are other ways of proceeding. For instance, I could use a form of steganography and hide a message in a digital image. Whatever the government is doing, people will find ways around it.
Also, the evidence that restricting encryption would help against organized crime is not enormous. If that important then you need to find other ways, like [The so called attack is a method whereby you park a van outside someone house and monitor the distinct electromagnetic signals given off as they type each computer keystroke.] Or you can send special monitoring viruses into the computers of the people you are watching. There are other technologies you can use that are being developed for these purposes.
My view is that widespread use of encryption would not increase the rate of crime. In fact restricting encryption might do the opposite. If we can encrypt our credit card details properly, that might make it easier for criminals. At the moment I don see this as a great threat to society quite the opposite. In 10 years, of course, we might have to reevaluate the whole situation.
Finally, I have to ask about your Challenge. You giving away $15,000 of your own hard earned cash to the first person who cracks all 10 codes at the back of your book. Do you expect anyone to solve it?
I think so and I be happy to give the money away. You can win $15,000 on TV from answering trivial questions, so if anyone can solve this they deserve the prize! The great thing is there such a diversity of people working on it. I recently spoke to a Field medalist who doing it. [The Field Medal is the mathematics world equivalent of the Nobel Prize.] But when I left England a few days ago, the person who was the furthest along was a 15 year old girl.
- wear van cleef pendant lucky lover copy give ground the wedding still happy
- popular fake van cleef white gold bracelet How much it?
- ornament van cleef ring alhambra lover fake give you marriag
- classic copy van cleef white gold jewelry do you want it?
- love imitation VCA pink gold jewelry How much it?
The Big Problem With The Trans
Investor state dispute settlement an integral part of the Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal allows companies to sue entire countries for costing them money when laws or regulations change. Cases are decided by extrajudicial tribunals composed of three corporate lawyers. Buzzfeed, in a multi part investigationlaunched Sunday, called it "the court that rules the world."
Although the ISDS process has existed for years,TPP would drastically expand it. The most common criticisms of the system are that it's secret, that it's dominated by unaccountable big firm lawyers, and that global corporations use it to change sovereign laws and undermine regulations. That's all true.
The ISDS system which is now written into over 3,000 international trade treaties, including NAFTA was designed to solve a specific problem. When corporations invest abroad, they fear that their factories might be nationalized or their products expropriated by governments that also control the local courts. ISDS is meant to give companies confidence that if a country seizes their accounts or factories, they'll have a fair, neutral place to appeal.
But instead of helping companies resolve legitimate disputes over seized assets, ISDS has increasingly become a way for rich investors to make money by speculating on lawsuits, winning huge awards and forcing taxpayers to foot the bill.
Here's how it works: Wealthy financiers with idle cash have purchased companies that are well placed to bring an ISDS claim, seemingly for the sole purpose of using that claim to make a buck. Sometimes, they set up shell corporations to create the plaintiffs to bring ISDS cases. And some hedge funds and private equity firms bankroll ISDS cases as third parties just like billionaire Peter Thiel bankrolled Hulk Hogan in his lawsuit against Gawker Media. housing debt for pennies on the dollar. As The Huffington Post reported in May, the financiers were betting they could use lawsuits and lobbying to influence the political system in favor of the creditors like them and reap huge rewards.
Indeed, the damage of ISDS goes far beyond the money that investors manage to extract from public coffers and extends to the corruption of a political system by investors who buy off scholars, economists and politicians in pursuit of whatever policy outcome leads to a payoff. And there's nothing stopping plutocrats with agendas that go beyond profit making from getting involved again the way Thiel did with Gawker. That alone changes the power dynamic: If you're the government of Thailand, the billionaire you're negotiating with has one extra threat at his disposal.
So called third party funding of "international arbitration against foreign sovereigns"has been expanding quickly, according to Selvyn Seidel, a pioneer in the litigation finance industry and now CEO of the advisory firm Fulbrook Capital Management.
"You can get an award for billions of dollars when that award would never come out in domestic law," said Gus van Harten, a professor at Osgoode Hall Law School at York University in Toronto. "It's just a jackpot for speculators."
Here's an example. In 2008, the Spanish government, under pressure from the eurozone to cut its budget during the financial crisis, began to reverse generous subsidies for solar energy. Spain reduced support for solar in stages. It changed the definition of its replica van cleef diamond ring main solar incentive program in 2008, reduced the subsidies through two measures in 2010, placed a moratorium on subsidies for new solar plants in 2011, and added further restrictions in 2013.
Renewable energy activists could only shout into the air. But a group of investors hatched a plan.
Between November 2011 and December 2013, 22 different companies sued Spain in seven different cases over the subsidy changes not in Spanish courts, but using ISDS.
RREEF, an investment fund subsidiary of Germany's Deutsche Bank, and Antin, a private equity firm owned by French bank BNP Paribas, purchased their Spanish solar thermal power plants in 2011, three years after the country began to roll back subsidies. But when they went to ISDS, they claimed they had expected subsidies to continue not to continue declining.
"It feels like they acquired [the solar plants] in order to sue," said , a campaigner for Corporate Europe Observatory, a Brussels based research organization. Those two cases are still pending; a tribunal order allowed the RREEF case to advance in June.
The facts suggest that these investment funds made their purchases based not on the potential success or failure of the business they bought, not out of a concern for climate change and its consequences, but with the expectation that the Spanish government would continue its subsidy rollback, allowing the funds to sue in a special court unavailable to Spanish citizens. (To be fair, HuffPost can't prove this to a certainty.) ISDS represented the purpose of the investment or, to phrase another way, the use of ISDS was an asset building strategy. Spain's renewable energy subsidies have not been restored. Instead, a cash strapped government is being forced to spend scarce resources defending a decision that was forced upon it.
Spain isn't the only government defending these sorts of ISDS claims. Potov Banka of the Czech Republic bought sovereign debt from Greece in early 2010, well after rating agencies haddowngraded the nation's bonds. Two years later, after European leaders forced a restructuring of all Greek government bonds, Potov and its shareholder, Istrokapital of Cyprus, filed an ISDS claim, contending that the restructuring cost them millions.
Maybe Potov bought the distressed bonds knowing that it could use arbitration as a fallback. Or maybe it bought the bonds with the intent to sue and gain a favorable return on its money through ISDS.
In several other cases, investors appeared to opportunistically purchase a company that had the ability to file an ISDS claim at exactly the right time.
In 2004, through one of its investment funds, the French bank Socit Gnrale purchased a 50 percent stake in a public private partnership to distribute electricity in the Dominican Republic. The purchase included intermediary companies from California, Delaware, Nevada and the Cayman Islands, and the corporate structure is nearly impossible to ascertain. (SocGen explained to arbitrators that it also arranged a "deferred purchase fee"). And the heart of the dispute the Dominican Republic's alleged failure to pay negotiated compensation occurred years before SocGen made its purchase, according to the country, which argued SocGen was merely "buying a claim."
Nonetheless, an ISDS tribunal ruled that "the principal objective of the transaction was the potential profitability of the investment." It found that the Dominican Republic's violations were ongoing and, through a settlement, awarded SocGen $26.5 million.
You can actually ask for enormous amounts replica van cleef arpels between finger ring of money without anybody criticizing you.
of Corporate Europe Observatory
Since Greek and Roman times, the wealthy have placed bets on the outcomes of court cases. Under English common law, financing someone else's lawsuit, known as champerty, was illegal. But the modern version of that,litigation finance which began in Australia in the 1960s has spread widely over the past two decades. Investors seeking higher returns on their savings have looked to courtrooms instead of stocks or bonds, agreeing to bankroll cases and taking a portion of the cash awards if they win.
Third party funding replica van cleef arpels ring shields corporations from the upfront costs of litigation, making it easier to sue. Since companies generally don't have to disclose that they've received third party funding for an ISDS case, and since international arbitration usually proceeds in comparative secrecy, pursuing a claim through ISDS can shield companies from the public criticism that accompanies challenging a law in regular courts. "You can actually ask for enormous amounts of money without anybody criticizing you," said Verheecke of Corporate Europe Observatory.
With ISDS permitted under some 3,000 treaties,there are a huge number of opportunities to sue. And "unlike some other legal systems, the default remedy is a cash payment," said Todd Tucker, a fellow at the Roosevelt Institute with a decade of experience researching trade and investment policy. The awards are also uncapped, meaning they can be enormous. If a corporation sought damages on future profits in perpetuity and the arbitrators agreed, the sovereign would have no recourse. Dozens of cases have resulted in awards of over $100 million, according to afrom van Harten, the law professor.
Defenders of ISDS argue that the outcome of any case is uncertain and that companies win only about one quarter of the time. But that's only the cases that have been publicly identified and it doesn't include settlements, where the corporation can also extract a monetary award. If funding ISDS suits was really such a bad bet, the industry probably wouldn't be expanding so quickly.
Investor state dispute settlement an integral part of the Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal allows companies to sue entire countries for costing them money when laws or regulations change. Cases are decided by extrajudicial tribunals composed of three corporate lawyers. Buzzfeed, in a multi part investigationlaunched Sunday, called it "the court that rules the world."
Although the ISDS process has existed for years,TPP would drastically expand it. The most common criticisms of the system are that it's secret, that it's dominated by unaccountable big firm lawyers, and that global corporations use it to change sovereign laws and undermine regulations. That's all true.
The ISDS system which is now written into over 3,000 international trade treaties, including NAFTA was designed to solve a specific problem. When corporations invest abroad, they fear that their factories might be nationalized or their products expropriated by governments that also control the local courts. ISDS is meant to give companies confidence that if a country seizes their accounts or factories, they'll have a fair, neutral place to appeal.
But instead of helping companies resolve legitimate disputes over seized assets, ISDS has increasingly become a way for rich investors to make money by speculating on lawsuits, winning huge awards and forcing taxpayers to foot the bill.
Here's how it works: Wealthy financiers with idle cash have purchased companies that are well placed to bring an ISDS claim, seemingly for the sole purpose of using that claim to make a buck. Sometimes, they set up shell corporations to create the plaintiffs to bring ISDS cases. And some hedge funds and private equity firms bankroll ISDS cases as third parties just like billionaire Peter Thiel bankrolled Hulk Hogan in his lawsuit against Gawker Media. housing debt for pennies on the dollar. As The Huffington Post reported in May, the financiers were betting they could use lawsuits and lobbying to influence the political system in favor of the creditors like them and reap huge rewards.
Indeed, the damage of ISDS goes far beyond the money that investors manage to extract from public coffers and extends to the corruption of a political system by investors who buy off scholars, economists and politicians in pursuit of whatever policy outcome leads to a payoff. And there's nothing stopping plutocrats with agendas that go beyond profit making from getting involved again the way Thiel did with Gawker. That alone changes the power dynamic: If you're the government of Thailand, the billionaire you're negotiating with has one extra threat at his disposal.
So called third party funding of "international arbitration against foreign sovereigns"has been expanding quickly, according to Selvyn Seidel, a pioneer in the litigation finance industry and now CEO of the advisory firm Fulbrook Capital Management.
"You can get an award for billions of dollars when that award would never come out in domestic law," said Gus van Harten, a professor at Osgoode Hall Law School at York University in Toronto. "It's just a jackpot for speculators."
Here's an example. In 2008, the Spanish government, under pressure from the eurozone to cut its budget during the financial crisis, began to reverse generous subsidies for solar energy. Spain reduced support for solar in stages. It changed the definition of its replica van cleef diamond ring main solar incentive program in 2008, reduced the subsidies through two measures in 2010, placed a moratorium on subsidies for new solar plants in 2011, and added further restrictions in 2013.
Renewable energy activists could only shout into the air. But a group of investors hatched a plan.
Between November 2011 and December 2013, 22 different companies sued Spain in seven different cases over the subsidy changes not in Spanish courts, but using ISDS.
RREEF, an investment fund subsidiary of Germany's Deutsche Bank, and Antin, a private equity firm owned by French bank BNP Paribas, purchased their Spanish solar thermal power plants in 2011, three years after the country began to roll back subsidies. But when they went to ISDS, they claimed they had expected subsidies to continue not to continue declining.
"It feels like they acquired [the solar plants] in order to sue," said , a campaigner for Corporate Europe Observatory, a Brussels based research organization. Those two cases are still pending; a tribunal order allowed the RREEF case to advance in June.
The facts suggest that these investment funds made their purchases based not on the potential success or failure of the business they bought, not out of a concern for climate change and its consequences, but with the expectation that the Spanish government would continue its subsidy rollback, allowing the funds to sue in a special court unavailable to Spanish citizens. (To be fair, HuffPost can't prove this to a certainty.) ISDS represented the purpose of the investment or, to phrase another way, the use of ISDS was an asset building strategy. Spain's renewable energy subsidies have not been restored. Instead, a cash strapped government is being forced to spend scarce resources defending a decision that was forced upon it.
Spain isn't the only government defending these sorts of ISDS claims. Potov Banka of the Czech Republic bought sovereign debt from Greece in early 2010, well after rating agencies haddowngraded the nation's bonds. Two years later, after European leaders forced a restructuring of all Greek government bonds, Potov and its shareholder, Istrokapital of Cyprus, filed an ISDS claim, contending that the restructuring cost them millions.
Maybe Potov bought the distressed bonds knowing that it could use arbitration as a fallback. Or maybe it bought the bonds with the intent to sue and gain a favorable return on its money through ISDS.
In several other cases, investors appeared to opportunistically purchase a company that had the ability to file an ISDS claim at exactly the right time.
In 2004, through one of its investment funds, the French bank Socit Gnrale purchased a 50 percent stake in a public private partnership to distribute electricity in the Dominican Republic. The purchase included intermediary companies from California, Delaware, Nevada and the Cayman Islands, and the corporate structure is nearly impossible to ascertain. (SocGen explained to arbitrators that it also arranged a "deferred purchase fee"). And the heart of the dispute the Dominican Republic's alleged failure to pay negotiated compensation occurred years before SocGen made its purchase, according to the country, which argued SocGen was merely "buying a claim."
Nonetheless, an ISDS tribunal ruled that "the principal objective of the transaction was the potential profitability of the investment." It found that the Dominican Republic's violations were ongoing and, through a settlement, awarded SocGen $26.5 million.
You can actually ask for enormous amounts replica van cleef arpels between finger ring of money without anybody criticizing you.
of Corporate Europe Observatory
Since Greek and Roman times, the wealthy have placed bets on the outcomes of court cases. Under English common law, financing someone else's lawsuit, known as champerty, was illegal. But the modern version of that,litigation finance which began in Australia in the 1960s has spread widely over the past two decades. Investors seeking higher returns on their savings have looked to courtrooms instead of stocks or bonds, agreeing to bankroll cases and taking a portion of the cash awards if they win.
Third party funding replica van cleef arpels ring shields corporations from the upfront costs of litigation, making it easier to sue. Since companies generally don't have to disclose that they've received third party funding for an ISDS case, and since international arbitration usually proceeds in comparative secrecy, pursuing a claim through ISDS can shield companies from the public criticism that accompanies challenging a law in regular courts. "You can actually ask for enormous amounts of money without anybody criticizing you," said Verheecke of Corporate Europe Observatory.
With ISDS permitted under some 3,000 treaties,there are a huge number of opportunities to sue. And "unlike some other legal systems, the default remedy is a cash payment," said Todd Tucker, a fellow at the Roosevelt Institute with a decade of experience researching trade and investment policy. The awards are also uncapped, meaning they can be enormous. If a corporation sought damages on future profits in perpetuity and the arbitrators agreed, the sovereign would have no recourse. Dozens of cases have resulted in awards of over $100 million, according to afrom van Harten, the law professor.
Defenders of ISDS argue that the outcome of any case is uncertain and that companies win only about one quarter of the time. But that's only the cases that have been publicly identified and it doesn't include settlements, where the corporation can also extract a monetary award. If funding ISDS suits was really such a bad bet, the industry probably wouldn't be expanding so quickly.
- love replica VCA with diamonds necklace price?
- adorn arpels van cleef necklace alhambra couple kn
- unique magic van cleef with diamonds earring do you want it?
- charm imitation VCA diamonds pendant do you want it?
- ornament van arpels necklace lucky woman imitation Let you matrimonial still further goodliness
THE HARDEST THING
My anger management group is no place for the weak. While I am very compassionate and respectful, I have zero tolerance for denial, blame, self pity and the like. Monday night was no exception.
"Sharon" sat down on the large blue sofa along with the other women. As always, I asked the ladies how they were doing since our last meeting a week ago. "I'm having a problem with some of the women here," Sharon said. (She was referring to those at the battered women's shelter where our meetings are held.) "Last night I told my roommate to turn the light off so I could go to sleep and she got nasty with me. Then, when I got up the next morning to go to my appointment, no one told me the van was leaving so I missed my ride. Later, I was using the pay phone and moved the garbage can into the hall because it was in my way. A staff member yelled at me and told me I had to put it back. I told her it's a free country and I can do what I want. She got nasty with me so I got nasty back. I'm tired of these btches pushing me around!"
She proceeded to congratulate herself for not hitting anyone. "I've been to anger management before. I don't need this group. I didn't hit anyone like I used to."
I, too, applauded her for the progress she had made. This was impressive for someone who grew up where violence is an acceptable way of life. But I needed to take her beyond where the other group left off. "Let's take a look at the role you played in each of these situations so you can do things differently in the future and avoid further problems. In the first, did you ask your roommate politely or were you rude?" "I was rude but she didn't have to get nasty with me so I cursed her out!" "Could you have asked politely?" I inquired. "Yes but even so, she didn't have to be a 'b'!"
I proceeded: "You do know that the van leaves precisely at 6 am every morning, don't you?" I asked. "Yes", she replied. "What could you have done differently to ensure you were on time?" "I could have gotten up earlier." I could see she was becoming agitated that I was focusing on her role in each of the arduous situations. "This is a shelter and they have rules everyone is expected to abide by. To move a garbage can into the hallway presents a fire hazard and is in violation of the town's fire code. Staff was only doing their job." "That's ridiculous!" she shouted. "It's a stupid garbage can, for God's sake! I could move it if I want to!" I was not surprised when she left the group.
The hardest thing we ever have to do in life is face the truth about ourselves. We are quick to credit ourselves for the right choices we make while failing to acknowledge our defects. Finding fault with others is effortless as it requires no self examination and effort on our part to change. But only when we are willing to acknowledge our role in what isn't working in our lives do we have the power to effect positive change.
Live in truth, no matter how (temporarily) painful: it is where your true personal power lies to prosper. Postal Service, AT Hoffman LaRoche, Rutgers University, Carnival Cruise Lines, United Way, YWCA, New Jersey Education Association, Care One, Insurance Restoration Specialists, Learning Annex, William Paterson University, Catholic Community Services, Passaic County Community College, American Business Academy, Bergen County Police and Fire Academy, Cook's College, Kean University, Rotary, Ocean County College, Kiwanis and more. State Certification in Domestic Violence and is a consultant and instructor at a battered women's shelter.
Janet has spoken at the United Nations, Notre Dame University (for the NACSDC National Conference), has served replica van cleef and arpels perlee ring price as committee member and keynote speaker for the van cleef diamond ring replica YWCA National Week Without Violence Campaign, and is a member of the National Police Suicide Foundation and past board member for the World Addiction Foundation.
She is a former columnist for the Daily Record and hosted her own cable TV and radio shows. Family. She has recently appeared in The Wall Street Journal, Huffington Post, Fusion, Alaska Business Monthly and more than 50 other publications.
As an inspirational speaker and private consultant, Janet is a frequent guest on radio and TV and has appeared on CNN, ABC News, The 700 Club, Lifetime, NBC News, Fox, CBS News, The Harvest Show, TruTV, Celebration and more than 100 top radio stations. She appears as a regular guest on WGUN Radio (Relationship Thursdays with DJ Kay and Janet Pfeiffer) and is a regular guest on replica van cleef and arpels ring price Ebru Today.
Janet runs "The Antidote to Anger Group" for court ordered offenders and those with issues of anger. Additionally, she is a member of EAPA, NJAWBO, ISBOG, MVP Seminars Speaker's Bureau and Visions in Motion Speaker's Bureau.
She has been nominated for many prestigious awards including the Russ Berrie "Make a Difference Award", 2010 NJ Governor's Jefferson Award, and has been presented with SOS "Positive Life Force" and "AOH" awards.
In 2001, she founded "Reunion of Hearts", Reconciling and Reconnecting Estranged Families", the nation's first non profit support group of its kind dedicated to the emotional healing and reuniting of estranged family members.
My anger management group is no place for the weak. While I am very compassionate and respectful, I have zero tolerance for denial, blame, self pity and the like. Monday night was no exception.
"Sharon" sat down on the large blue sofa along with the other women. As always, I asked the ladies how they were doing since our last meeting a week ago. "I'm having a problem with some of the women here," Sharon said. (She was referring to those at the battered women's shelter where our meetings are held.) "Last night I told my roommate to turn the light off so I could go to sleep and she got nasty with me. Then, when I got up the next morning to go to my appointment, no one told me the van was leaving so I missed my ride. Later, I was using the pay phone and moved the garbage can into the hall because it was in my way. A staff member yelled at me and told me I had to put it back. I told her it's a free country and I can do what I want. She got nasty with me so I got nasty back. I'm tired of these btches pushing me around!"
She proceeded to congratulate herself for not hitting anyone. "I've been to anger management before. I don't need this group. I didn't hit anyone like I used to."
I, too, applauded her for the progress she had made. This was impressive for someone who grew up where violence is an acceptable way of life. But I needed to take her beyond where the other group left off. "Let's take a look at the role you played in each of these situations so you can do things differently in the future and avoid further problems. In the first, did you ask your roommate politely or were you rude?" "I was rude but she didn't have to get nasty with me so I cursed her out!" "Could you have asked politely?" I inquired. "Yes but even so, she didn't have to be a 'b'!"
I proceeded: "You do know that the van leaves precisely at 6 am every morning, don't you?" I asked. "Yes", she replied. "What could you have done differently to ensure you were on time?" "I could have gotten up earlier." I could see she was becoming agitated that I was focusing on her role in each of the arduous situations. "This is a shelter and they have rules everyone is expected to abide by. To move a garbage can into the hallway presents a fire hazard and is in violation of the town's fire code. Staff was only doing their job." "That's ridiculous!" she shouted. "It's a stupid garbage can, for God's sake! I could move it if I want to!" I was not surprised when she left the group.
The hardest thing we ever have to do in life is face the truth about ourselves. We are quick to credit ourselves for the right choices we make while failing to acknowledge our defects. Finding fault with others is effortless as it requires no self examination and effort on our part to change. But only when we are willing to acknowledge our role in what isn't working in our lives do we have the power to effect positive change.
Live in truth, no matter how (temporarily) painful: it is where your true personal power lies to prosper. Postal Service, AT Hoffman LaRoche, Rutgers University, Carnival Cruise Lines, United Way, YWCA, New Jersey Education Association, Care One, Insurance Restoration Specialists, Learning Annex, William Paterson University, Catholic Community Services, Passaic County Community College, American Business Academy, Bergen County Police and Fire Academy, Cook's College, Kean University, Rotary, Ocean County College, Kiwanis and more. State Certification in Domestic Violence and is a consultant and instructor at a battered women's shelter.
Janet has spoken at the United Nations, Notre Dame University (for the NACSDC National Conference), has served replica van cleef and arpels perlee ring price as committee member and keynote speaker for the van cleef diamond ring replica YWCA National Week Without Violence Campaign, and is a member of the National Police Suicide Foundation and past board member for the World Addiction Foundation.
She is a former columnist for the Daily Record and hosted her own cable TV and radio shows. Family. She has recently appeared in The Wall Street Journal, Huffington Post, Fusion, Alaska Business Monthly and more than 50 other publications.
As an inspirational speaker and private consultant, Janet is a frequent guest on radio and TV and has appeared on CNN, ABC News, The 700 Club, Lifetime, NBC News, Fox, CBS News, The Harvest Show, TruTV, Celebration and more than 100 top radio stations. She appears as a regular guest on WGUN Radio (Relationship Thursdays with DJ Kay and Janet Pfeiffer) and is a regular guest on replica van cleef and arpels ring price Ebru Today.
Janet runs "The Antidote to Anger Group" for court ordered offenders and those with issues of anger. Additionally, she is a member of EAPA, NJAWBO, ISBOG, MVP Seminars Speaker's Bureau and Visions in Motion Speaker's Bureau.
She has been nominated for many prestigious awards including the Russ Berrie "Make a Difference Award", 2010 NJ Governor's Jefferson Award, and has been presented with SOS "Positive Life Force" and "AOH" awards.
In 2001, she founded "Reunion of Hearts", Reconciling and Reconnecting Estranged Families", the nation's first non profit support group of its kind dedicated to the emotional healing and reuniting of estranged family members.
- fashion copy van white pendant price?
- Put on van and arpels rings fortunate mens imitation give you matrimony still happiness
- embellish arpels van cleef ring trefoil woman knockoff make you the wedding still further happy
- decorate van and arpels bracelets alhambra men knockoff make you ceremony still well-being
- through van and arpels rings alhambra women copy g