freemexy's blog
Herbal medicine is the use of medicinal plants for prevention and
treatment of diseases: it ranges from traditional and popular medicines
of every country to the use of standardized and tritated herbal
extracts. Generally cultural rootedness enduring and widespread use in a
Traditional Medical System may indicate safety, but not efficacy of
treatments, especially in herbal medicine where tradition is almost
completely based on remedies containing active principles at very low
and ultra low concentrations, or relying on magical-energetic
principles.To get more news about herbal medicine, you can visit shine news official website.
In the age of globalization and of the so-called ‘plate world’, assessing the ‘transferability’ of treatments between different cultures is not a relevant goal for clinical research, while are the assessment of efficacy and safety that should be based on the regular patterns of mainstream clinical medicine.
The other black box of herbal-based treatments is the lack of definite and complete information about the composition of extracts. Herbal derived remedies need a powerful and deep assessment of their pharmacological qualities and safety that actually can be realized by new biologic technologies like pharmacogenomic, metabolomic and microarray methology. Because of the large and growing use of natural derived substances in all over the world, it is not wise to rely also on the tradition or supposed millenarian beliefs; explanatory and pragmatic studies are useful and should be considered complementary in the acquisition of reliable data both for health caregiver and patients.
Keywords: evidence based medicince, explanatory trials, herbal medicine, mainstream medicine, phytotherapy, pragmatic trials, traditional medical system, traditional medicine
Herbs are natural products and their chemical composition varies depending on several factors and therefore varying from people to people, from energetic decoctions to the use of herbal extracts following Western methodologies of mainstream medicine. Traditional medicines has a very long history: it is the sum total of the practices based on the theories, beliefs and experiences of different cultures and times, often inexplicable, used in the maintenance of health, as like in the prevention, diagnosis, improvement and treatment of illnesses.
In every country traditional medicines find foundation in magical or religious beliefs, or popular experience and the World Health Organization is engaged to establish definitive guidelines for methodology of clinical research and the appraisal of effectiveness of traditional medicine
For centuries traditional medical systems (TMS) were the primary medical system in the countries of origin, and now nevertheless the present dominance of the Western scientific medical model, citizens and health-caregivers are starting to rely and trust TMS substituting conventional scientifically proved therapies with unconventional ones. Generally cultural rootedness enduring and widespread use of TMS may indicate safety, but not the efficacy of the treatments especially in herbal medicines where tradition is almost completely based on remedies containing active principles at very low and ultra low concentrations, or relying on magical-energetic properties of sun, moon, etc.
In European traditional herbalism categories similar to Asiatic medicines, referring to ‘humoral-energetic doctrines’ that has qualities (like heat, cold, dry, humid), and elements (fire, air, water, earth, etc.) are used. European popular medicine still counsel the so-called depurative plants for treatment of dermatological illnesses, like psoriasis or eczemas, like it were due to intoxications, as well as diuretic plants for arthritis, or a decoction of Stachys (called ‘herb of fear’) used as bath to wash out fears, or hay baths as treatment of cancer.
In the age of globalization and of the so-called ‘plate world’, assessing the ‘transferability’ of treatments between different cultures is not a relevant goal for clinical research, while are the assessment of efficacy and safety that should be based on the regular patterns of mainstream clinical medicine.
The other black box of herbal-based treatments is the lack of definite and complete information about the composition of extracts. Herbal derived remedies need a powerful and deep assessment of their pharmacological qualities and safety that actually can be realized by new biologic technologies like pharmacogenomic, metabolomic and microarray methology. Because of the large and growing use of natural derived substances in all over the world, it is not wise to rely also on the tradition or supposed millenarian beliefs; explanatory and pragmatic studies are useful and should be considered complementary in the acquisition of reliable data both for health caregiver and patients.
Keywords: evidence based medicince, explanatory trials, herbal medicine, mainstream medicine, phytotherapy, pragmatic trials, traditional medical system, traditional medicine
Herbs are natural products and their chemical composition varies depending on several factors and therefore varying from people to people, from energetic decoctions to the use of herbal extracts following Western methodologies of mainstream medicine. Traditional medicines has a very long history: it is the sum total of the practices based on the theories, beliefs and experiences of different cultures and times, often inexplicable, used in the maintenance of health, as like in the prevention, diagnosis, improvement and treatment of illnesses.
In every country traditional medicines find foundation in magical or religious beliefs, or popular experience and the World Health Organization is engaged to establish definitive guidelines for methodology of clinical research and the appraisal of effectiveness of traditional medicine
For centuries traditional medical systems (TMS) were the primary medical system in the countries of origin, and now nevertheless the present dominance of the Western scientific medical model, citizens and health-caregivers are starting to rely and trust TMS substituting conventional scientifically proved therapies with unconventional ones. Generally cultural rootedness enduring and widespread use of TMS may indicate safety, but not the efficacy of the treatments especially in herbal medicines where tradition is almost completely based on remedies containing active principles at very low and ultra low concentrations, or relying on magical-energetic properties of sun, moon, etc.
In European traditional herbalism categories similar to Asiatic medicines, referring to ‘humoral-energetic doctrines’ that has qualities (like heat, cold, dry, humid), and elements (fire, air, water, earth, etc.) are used. European popular medicine still counsel the so-called depurative plants for treatment of dermatological illnesses, like psoriasis or eczemas, like it were due to intoxications, as well as diuretic plants for arthritis, or a decoction of Stachys (called ‘herb of fear’) used as bath to wash out fears, or hay baths as treatment of cancer.
Anyone in Shanghai who wants to be tested for the coronavirus can now
get one easily, in China’s latest step to allay fears so that economic
activity can resume.To get more news about shanghai coronavirus update, you can visit shine news official website.
Companies and individuals in Shanghai can book the nucleic acid tests at their own expense in designated hospitals and clinics, according to the city government’s statement on Weibo. The tests will be conducted on a voluntary basis, aimed at helping companies and schools resume operations.
Similar efforts are likely to be rolled out nationwide after Chinese Premier Li Keqiang called at a Wednesday meeting for large-scale nucleic acid and antibody testing to better prevent and control the epidemic. Chinese leaders are seeking to revive the virus-hit economy while cautiously preventing the resurgence of infection.While China has faced criticism that it has concealed the extent of the coronavirus outbreak, its efforts in mass testing are in striking contrast to the U.S., currently at the epicenter of the pandemic. Cases in the U.S. have exploded to more than 840,000 as attempts to track the outbreak have been hampered by shortages of tests.
In China, a serological survey has been initiated to capture the true scale of the virus outbreak and to reflect how the virus transmitted among people. The survey involves researchers taking blood samples from a representative group of people to see if they have generated antibodies to fight the virus, a sign they’ve been infected. Investigators are blood testing 11,000 people who lived in the epicenter city of Wuhan during the height of the epidemic.
In addition to accelerating testing, officials at the Wednesday meeting urged the production of more convenient and efficient testing equipment. Such equipment would be widely distributed to hospitals, ports, and other key destinations.
In Wuhan, the city where the virus first emerged, individuals need to take the nucleic acid tests before they leave after months of lockdown. Many companies in Wuhan have required employees to test if they have the coronavirus or its antibodies before they returned to work.
Companies and individuals in Shanghai can book the nucleic acid tests at their own expense in designated hospitals and clinics, according to the city government’s statement on Weibo. The tests will be conducted on a voluntary basis, aimed at helping companies and schools resume operations.
Similar efforts are likely to be rolled out nationwide after Chinese Premier Li Keqiang called at a Wednesday meeting for large-scale nucleic acid and antibody testing to better prevent and control the epidemic. Chinese leaders are seeking to revive the virus-hit economy while cautiously preventing the resurgence of infection.While China has faced criticism that it has concealed the extent of the coronavirus outbreak, its efforts in mass testing are in striking contrast to the U.S., currently at the epicenter of the pandemic. Cases in the U.S. have exploded to more than 840,000 as attempts to track the outbreak have been hampered by shortages of tests.
In China, a serological survey has been initiated to capture the true scale of the virus outbreak and to reflect how the virus transmitted among people. The survey involves researchers taking blood samples from a representative group of people to see if they have generated antibodies to fight the virus, a sign they’ve been infected. Investigators are blood testing 11,000 people who lived in the epicenter city of Wuhan during the height of the epidemic.
In addition to accelerating testing, officials at the Wednesday meeting urged the production of more convenient and efficient testing equipment. Such equipment would be widely distributed to hospitals, ports, and other key destinations.
In Wuhan, the city where the virus first emerged, individuals need to take the nucleic acid tests before they leave after months of lockdown. Many companies in Wuhan have required employees to test if they have the coronavirus or its antibodies before they returned to work.
listed online travel giant Ctrip is talking to banks about a planned
secondary listing in Hong Kong, putting the group at the head of a queue
of Chinese companies expected to follow Alibaba in establishing an
investor base closer to China.To get more Ctrip news, you can visit shine news official website.
Ctrip, also known as Trip.com Group Ltd, has approached China International Capital Corp, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley for its planned share sale in Hong Kong, said four people with knowledge of the matter.
Ctrip, which had declined to comment earlier, late on Friday said: "The specific details of the listing reported are not true. The company does not have plans yet for a secondary listing."
No banks have been mandated, and more banks may be involved, the sources said.China's largest online travel firm looks to sell at least 10per cent of its shares as early as the first half of the year, said two of the people who declined to be named as the information was private.
Based on Ctrip's latest market value of US$20.6 billion on Nasdaq, that would help it to raise at least US$2 billion. But the sources said the deal was still in the early stages and the details were subject to change.
The move comes weeks after the successful US$12.9 billion secondary listing of Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba Group in Hong Kong in November, which was the city's largest deal since 2010 and the world's biggest ever cross-border secondary listing.Charles Li, chief executive of bourse operator Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing, said this week at a Reuters BreakingViews event that he was confident more U.S.-listed companies would follow Alibaba.
"I think just by their nature they will come, because their customers know them and they will potentially get a better valuation re-rate if your customer know your business and wants to become your shareholder," he said, noting too that adding Chinese shareholders could help to balance U.S. investor views.
"A different shareholder base means that you are hedged because the Chinese are going to look at the world very differently from the western investors and as a company you want people to have different views," he added.
Co-founded in 1999 by Chinese businessman Liang Jianzhang, Ctrip first went public on Nasdaq in 2003, as part of an early wave of Chinese tech companies lured by high valuations overseas, at a time when domestic markets were a fraction of their current size.
Both the HKEX and its mainland Chinese counterparts have been trying to coax such companies to their home markets to give Chinese investors access to these fast-growing businesses that have traditionally opted to list in New York.
Apart from Ctrip, U.S.-listed Chinese tech companies, including NetEase Inc and Baidu Inc, have also had preliminary discussions with the HKEX about the possibility of a secondary listing in the city, said a separate person with direct knowledge of the matter.Baidu and the HKEX declined to comment. NetEase did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Ctrip, also known as Trip.com Group Ltd, has approached China International Capital Corp, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley for its planned share sale in Hong Kong, said four people with knowledge of the matter.
Ctrip, which had declined to comment earlier, late on Friday said: "The specific details of the listing reported are not true. The company does not have plans yet for a secondary listing."
No banks have been mandated, and more banks may be involved, the sources said.China's largest online travel firm looks to sell at least 10per cent of its shares as early as the first half of the year, said two of the people who declined to be named as the information was private.
Based on Ctrip's latest market value of US$20.6 billion on Nasdaq, that would help it to raise at least US$2 billion. But the sources said the deal was still in the early stages and the details were subject to change.
The move comes weeks after the successful US$12.9 billion secondary listing of Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba Group in Hong Kong in November, which was the city's largest deal since 2010 and the world's biggest ever cross-border secondary listing.Charles Li, chief executive of bourse operator Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing, said this week at a Reuters BreakingViews event that he was confident more U.S.-listed companies would follow Alibaba.
"I think just by their nature they will come, because their customers know them and they will potentially get a better valuation re-rate if your customer know your business and wants to become your shareholder," he said, noting too that adding Chinese shareholders could help to balance U.S. investor views.
"A different shareholder base means that you are hedged because the Chinese are going to look at the world very differently from the western investors and as a company you want people to have different views," he added.
Co-founded in 1999 by Chinese businessman Liang Jianzhang, Ctrip first went public on Nasdaq in 2003, as part of an early wave of Chinese tech companies lured by high valuations overseas, at a time when domestic markets were a fraction of their current size.
Both the HKEX and its mainland Chinese counterparts have been trying to coax such companies to their home markets to give Chinese investors access to these fast-growing businesses that have traditionally opted to list in New York.
Apart from Ctrip, U.S.-listed Chinese tech companies, including NetEase Inc and Baidu Inc, have also had preliminary discussions with the HKEX about the possibility of a secondary listing in the city, said a separate person with direct knowledge of the matter.Baidu and the HKEX declined to comment. NetEase did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Does Tencent’s E-Commerce Move Spell Trouble for JD.com?
Tencent (OTC:TCEH.Y) recently launched Minishop, a new tool that lets merchants directly launch online stores on WeChat. WeChat is the most popular messaging app in China with over 1.2 billion monthly active users, so the move could set the foundations for a new e-commerce marketplace.To get more JD.com news, you can visit shine news official website.
Tencent previously allowed retailers to set up shop on WeChat's Mini Programs platform, which also hosts games, ride-hailing services, delivery services, and other tools. But companies usually need to hire developers to create the Mini Programs, since they were essentially stand-alone apps.
The Minishop tool simplifies the process and helps vendors quickly set up WeChat shops without help from external developers. This could make it easier for merchants of all sizes to sell products on WeChat -- and it could spell trouble for China's e-commerce leaders Alibaba (NYSE:BABA), JD.com (NASDAQ:JD), and Pinduoduo (NASDAQ:PDD).Yet Tencent's announcement is especially troubling for JD, its longtime e-commerce partner. Tencent owns nearly a fifth of JD, it hosts JD's Mini Programs on WeChat, and the two companies offer cross-platform marketing solutions for other companies. Tencent and JD also co-invested in the flash sale underdog Vipshop in late 2017. Does Tencent's Minishop indicate it's evolving into a competitor to JD? Or is there still room for both these platforms to grow?
Is Tencent getting ready to cut ties with JD?
On the surface, Tencent and JD seem like steadfast allies, united in their fight against Alibaba (NYSE:BABA). But there are cracks appearing under the surface.
Tencent initially owned a 20% stake in JD after the latter's IPO in 2014, but it had reduced that stake to 17.1% by early 2020. That reduction might seem minor, but Tencent’s stake in Pinduoduo also declined over the past year due to the e-commerce company’s secondary offering. At the same time, Tencent ramped up its investments in Missfresh, an online grocery delivery start-up that directly competes against JD and Walmart's JD Daojia joint venture.
Tencent's introduction of WeChat's Mini Programs platform in 2017 indicated it wanted to lock users into a walled garden with "in-app apps." Doing so would allow Tencent to own an "app store" without owning a major mobile OS, and tether its users more tightly to its sprawling ecosystem.
JD launched its own Mini Programs, but Tencent also allowed other retailers to set up shop in WeChat. That decision arguably diluted the partnership between the two companies and suggested Tencent was building a decentralized e-commerce marketplace to challenge Alibaba, JD, and Pinduoduo. The introduction of its Minishop tools, which could open the floodgates for smaller vendors, supports those aspirations.Tencent's Mini Programs surpassed 400 million daily active users last quarter, representing roughly a third of WeChat's monthly audience. Tencent's WeChat Pay, which is integrated into the app, is also one of the two most widely used digital payment platforms in China. Those two growth engines, along with WeChat's growing number of e-commerce Mini Programs and Minishops, could support WeChat's evolution into an e-commerce platform.
During last quarter's conference call, Tencent President Martin Lau admitted many of Tencent's "investee companies" (including JD and Vipshop) are "also engaged in e-commerce platforms," but "building a stronger e-commerce ecosystem within WeChat is actually going to be synergistic to them" as more people grow accustomed to "buying products and services on WeChat."
In other words, Tencent wants WeChat to become a top destination for online shopping -- which could pull shoppers away from other stand-alone marketplaces like JD -- and its desire to host more merchants could force JD and other retailers to rely more heavily on promotions to stay competitive on WeChat.
Tencent (OTC:TCEH.Y) recently launched Minishop, a new tool that lets merchants directly launch online stores on WeChat. WeChat is the most popular messaging app in China with over 1.2 billion monthly active users, so the move could set the foundations for a new e-commerce marketplace.To get more JD.com news, you can visit shine news official website.
Tencent previously allowed retailers to set up shop on WeChat's Mini Programs platform, which also hosts games, ride-hailing services, delivery services, and other tools. But companies usually need to hire developers to create the Mini Programs, since they were essentially stand-alone apps.
The Minishop tool simplifies the process and helps vendors quickly set up WeChat shops without help from external developers. This could make it easier for merchants of all sizes to sell products on WeChat -- and it could spell trouble for China's e-commerce leaders Alibaba (NYSE:BABA), JD.com (NASDAQ:JD), and Pinduoduo (NASDAQ:PDD).Yet Tencent's announcement is especially troubling for JD, its longtime e-commerce partner. Tencent owns nearly a fifth of JD, it hosts JD's Mini Programs on WeChat, and the two companies offer cross-platform marketing solutions for other companies. Tencent and JD also co-invested in the flash sale underdog Vipshop in late 2017. Does Tencent's Minishop indicate it's evolving into a competitor to JD? Or is there still room for both these platforms to grow?
Is Tencent getting ready to cut ties with JD?
On the surface, Tencent and JD seem like steadfast allies, united in their fight against Alibaba (NYSE:BABA). But there are cracks appearing under the surface.
Tencent initially owned a 20% stake in JD after the latter's IPO in 2014, but it had reduced that stake to 17.1% by early 2020. That reduction might seem minor, but Tencent’s stake in Pinduoduo also declined over the past year due to the e-commerce company’s secondary offering. At the same time, Tencent ramped up its investments in Missfresh, an online grocery delivery start-up that directly competes against JD and Walmart's JD Daojia joint venture.
Tencent's introduction of WeChat's Mini Programs platform in 2017 indicated it wanted to lock users into a walled garden with "in-app apps." Doing so would allow Tencent to own an "app store" without owning a major mobile OS, and tether its users more tightly to its sprawling ecosystem.
JD launched its own Mini Programs, but Tencent also allowed other retailers to set up shop in WeChat. That decision arguably diluted the partnership between the two companies and suggested Tencent was building a decentralized e-commerce marketplace to challenge Alibaba, JD, and Pinduoduo. The introduction of its Minishop tools, which could open the floodgates for smaller vendors, supports those aspirations.Tencent's Mini Programs surpassed 400 million daily active users last quarter, representing roughly a third of WeChat's monthly audience. Tencent's WeChat Pay, which is integrated into the app, is also one of the two most widely used digital payment platforms in China. Those two growth engines, along with WeChat's growing number of e-commerce Mini Programs and Minishops, could support WeChat's evolution into an e-commerce platform.
During last quarter's conference call, Tencent President Martin Lau admitted many of Tencent's "investee companies" (including JD and Vipshop) are "also engaged in e-commerce platforms," but "building a stronger e-commerce ecosystem within WeChat is actually going to be synergistic to them" as more people grow accustomed to "buying products and services on WeChat."
In other words, Tencent wants WeChat to become a top destination for online shopping -- which could pull shoppers away from other stand-alone marketplaces like JD -- and its desire to host more merchants could force JD and other retailers to rely more heavily on promotions to stay competitive on WeChat.
Leading a company through a crisis is no mean feat — and for some, it
can be their undoing. But for those that get it right, it can be an
opportunity to set the business apart from the pack. To get more Alibaba news, you can visit shine news official website.
That was the case for Chinese technology giant Alibaba Group, executive vice chairman and director of Alibaba’s entrepreneur fund Joe Tsai said in a recent interview.
Now an e-commerce giant worth some $678 billion, Alibaba was about to launch Taobao, its online marketplace for consumers, in 2003 when crisis struck. China was hit hard by a then-novel coronavirus outbreak known at SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome), which forced businesses to shutter and people to shelter in their homes.That might have been it for the nascent company. But instead, Tsai and his 17 co-founders, including Jack Ma, decided to pivot. They implemented what was then a novel — and clunky — work-from-home system to ensure the launch went ahead on time.
“We wanted to make sure that when customers emailed or called us, we could serve them,” said Tsai. “Obviously, the first thing you want to do is make sure your employees are safe and working in conditions where things continue to function. As long as that’s in place, they can continue to serve their customers.”
Just weeks later, Taobao was launched as planned on May 10, 2003. The self-imposed quarantine became a watershed moment for China’s economy, as domestic consumers turned to the internet to order goods online.
Tsai said that steadfast commitment to the mission was instrumental to the company’s success — and remains so today: “Fast forward to today and our focus on the customer is still an absolute priority.” That offers an important lesson for start-ups struggling with today’s Covid-19 pandemic, the entrepreneur continued during his wide-ranging discussion with Tony Wong, co-founder and CEO of e-commerce platform, Shopline.
Specifically, business owners should focus on the core goal of their business. If that still remains, even amid the downturn, then it’s worth carrying on.“As an entrepreneur, I don’t think you should chase ideas. I think you have to go back to why you founded the business in the first place,” said Tsai. “Look at what the mission was and the problem you were trying to solve. And if the same problems still exist and the same customers are still there, then it makes sense to continue your business.”
“But if you’re just chasing ideas, then you don’t have the passion. You’re chasing it because it’s a money-making opportunity and not because you really love pursuing your mission. Let your mission guide your direction.Just like for Alibaba, that may mean innovating and coming up with new ways to reach that goal amid current limitations.
“You can definitely look inward to change your bad hand,” said Tsai. “Let’s say you’re in the restaurant business and the restaurant has shut down — there’s nothing you can do about it. (But) I think a lot of companies now are thinking of alternatives.”
“Just because the restaurant’s shut down, customers don’t stop eating and the alternative is adapting to takeout. The adaptability of the business is very important. Teamwork and internal communication are key to adapting to a new normal,” he said.
That was the case for Chinese technology giant Alibaba Group, executive vice chairman and director of Alibaba’s entrepreneur fund Joe Tsai said in a recent interview.
Now an e-commerce giant worth some $678 billion, Alibaba was about to launch Taobao, its online marketplace for consumers, in 2003 when crisis struck. China was hit hard by a then-novel coronavirus outbreak known at SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome), which forced businesses to shutter and people to shelter in their homes.That might have been it for the nascent company. But instead, Tsai and his 17 co-founders, including Jack Ma, decided to pivot. They implemented what was then a novel — and clunky — work-from-home system to ensure the launch went ahead on time.
“We wanted to make sure that when customers emailed or called us, we could serve them,” said Tsai. “Obviously, the first thing you want to do is make sure your employees are safe and working in conditions where things continue to function. As long as that’s in place, they can continue to serve their customers.”
Just weeks later, Taobao was launched as planned on May 10, 2003. The self-imposed quarantine became a watershed moment for China’s economy, as domestic consumers turned to the internet to order goods online.
Tsai said that steadfast commitment to the mission was instrumental to the company’s success — and remains so today: “Fast forward to today and our focus on the customer is still an absolute priority.” That offers an important lesson for start-ups struggling with today’s Covid-19 pandemic, the entrepreneur continued during his wide-ranging discussion with Tony Wong, co-founder and CEO of e-commerce platform, Shopline.
Specifically, business owners should focus on the core goal of their business. If that still remains, even amid the downturn, then it’s worth carrying on.“As an entrepreneur, I don’t think you should chase ideas. I think you have to go back to why you founded the business in the first place,” said Tsai. “Look at what the mission was and the problem you were trying to solve. And if the same problems still exist and the same customers are still there, then it makes sense to continue your business.”
“But if you’re just chasing ideas, then you don’t have the passion. You’re chasing it because it’s a money-making opportunity and not because you really love pursuing your mission. Let your mission guide your direction.Just like for Alibaba, that may mean innovating and coming up with new ways to reach that goal amid current limitations.
“You can definitely look inward to change your bad hand,” said Tsai. “Let’s say you’re in the restaurant business and the restaurant has shut down — there’s nothing you can do about it. (But) I think a lot of companies now are thinking of alternatives.”
“Just because the restaurant’s shut down, customers don’t stop eating and the alternative is adapting to takeout. The adaptability of the business is very important. Teamwork and internal communication are key to adapting to a new normal,” he said.
The good news is that the WoW Classic release date is just a week away
and will include a lot of happy Blizzard customers.Fans have been hyped
about the Vanilla Mode since it was first announced during Blizzcon.To
get more news about Buy WoW Items, you can visit lootwowgold news official website.
Name Registration is already open for those who want to be first to explore the old ways of World of Warcraft.But fans are also being warned of server Realms facing severe overcrowding issues.A recent message from Blizzard explains: “We have contingency plans in place to bring up additional realms quickly if needed.
“We may also integrate character transfers (this ultimately became a service in original WoW.)“As you can imagine, it’s difficult for us to gauge how many people will come to play Classic and stay on to experience max-level content.
“Ultimately, we want to see realms with healthy stable populations so we’ll try to match demand without inadvertently creating low population realms in the process.”“Based on name reservations so far, the Herod realm is looking to be massively overpopulated,” the Blizzard statement adds. “If all existing players on this server remain there, login queues in excess of 10,000 players are a certainty, and possibly much higher than that.
“We recently opened up the Stalagg realm, and we urge players on Herod to consider moving there. There are a lot of players currently on Herod and we want Stalagg to fill up before we open any new PvP realms.
“This is so that player population is spread as evenly as possible before launch, in order to provide the best play experience.“While we are able to fit several times more players on a single realm in 2019 than was the case in 2006, we are not going to raise that cap any further, even though we have the technical capacity to do so.
“Raising realm caps would simply forestall the problem, letting more players in at launch but creating an unsustainable situation down the line, with severe queues when we turn off layering permanently before Phase 2 of our content unlock plan.”
Name Registration is already open for those who want to be first to explore the old ways of World of Warcraft.But fans are also being warned of server Realms facing severe overcrowding issues.A recent message from Blizzard explains: “We have contingency plans in place to bring up additional realms quickly if needed.
“We may also integrate character transfers (this ultimately became a service in original WoW.)“As you can imagine, it’s difficult for us to gauge how many people will come to play Classic and stay on to experience max-level content.
“Ultimately, we want to see realms with healthy stable populations so we’ll try to match demand without inadvertently creating low population realms in the process.”“Based on name reservations so far, the Herod realm is looking to be massively overpopulated,” the Blizzard statement adds. “If all existing players on this server remain there, login queues in excess of 10,000 players are a certainty, and possibly much higher than that.
“We recently opened up the Stalagg realm, and we urge players on Herod to consider moving there. There are a lot of players currently on Herod and we want Stalagg to fill up before we open any new PvP realms.
“This is so that player population is spread as evenly as possible before launch, in order to provide the best play experience.“While we are able to fit several times more players on a single realm in 2019 than was the case in 2006, we are not going to raise that cap any further, even though we have the technical capacity to do so.
“Raising realm caps would simply forestall the problem, letting more players in at launch but creating an unsustainable situation down the line, with severe queues when we turn off layering permanently before Phase 2 of our content unlock plan.”
World of Warcraft Classic is a faithful reproduction of the first game
and if Blizzard chooses to release Burning Crusade and the Wrath of the
Lich King, they will follow the same path. Many fans are asking the
company to proceed, as the events of Cataclysm made the iconic
continents of Outlands and Northrend virtually unrecognizable. The
changes that have occurred in the game rendered many quests and stories
inaccessible, so bringing back those two expansions would make sense.To
get more news about WoW Gold Classic, you can visit lootwowgold news official website.
There are, however, plenty of reasons against going beyond World of Warcraft Classic. For starters, the community of players currently enjoying the WoW vanilla will be divided even further, leaving the realm unpopulated. No matter how good of a job Blizzard does, there are simply not enough players to enjoy all their World of Warcraft games simultaneously. The classic versions are too complicated to appeal to most of the new generation of players, while only a fraction of the veterans have returned to gaming.
World of Warcraft Classic is also supposed to be a breakaway from the latest expansions of the franchise. It would defeat the purpose of increasing the number of subscriptions if players would forsake the new iterations for a chance to play the classic games. Blizzard should instead focus on releasing new content that appeals to both audiences, by learning something from these valuable lessons. World of Warcraft Classic was a pleasant stroll down memory lane, but living in the past isn’t the way to go.
There are, however, plenty of reasons against going beyond World of Warcraft Classic. For starters, the community of players currently enjoying the WoW vanilla will be divided even further, leaving the realm unpopulated. No matter how good of a job Blizzard does, there are simply not enough players to enjoy all their World of Warcraft games simultaneously. The classic versions are too complicated to appeal to most of the new generation of players, while only a fraction of the veterans have returned to gaming.
World of Warcraft Classic is also supposed to be a breakaway from the latest expansions of the franchise. It would defeat the purpose of increasing the number of subscriptions if players would forsake the new iterations for a chance to play the classic games. Blizzard should instead focus on releasing new content that appeals to both audiences, by learning something from these valuable lessons. World of Warcraft Classic was a pleasant stroll down memory lane, but living in the past isn’t the way to go.
World of Warcraft Classic is set to launch later this month, but
depending on the MMO realm you select to play in, the wait time to login
could be ridiculous.To get more news about WoW Gold Classic, you can visit lootwowgold news official website.
As Eurogamer reports, in the run up to launch Blizzard is allowing players to reserve a character name and choose a preferred realm to play in. The problem is, one realm in particular is proving to be extremely popular. It's called Herod and there's so many players selecting it Blizzard believes the login queue will be "in excess of 10,000 players."
A login queue simply means waiting to be allowed to login to the server to play. If there's a handful of players waiting ahead of you, then there's time to go make a coffee. However, 10,000+ players in the queue and you might as well go play something else and try again another day.
Blizzard won't solve the problem by increasing the number of players each server can handle. They could, but rather than solving it would just delay the same problem. Instead, Blizzard is calling upon players to choose another realm to play in. A plea was posted on Battle.net by community manager Kaivax requesting this:
Kaivax also points out that the realm population estimates of "Low, Medium, High" are set at 2019 levels rather than 2006 levels, meaning many more players per server today can and will be handled. Blizzard intends to run WoW Classic for years, so it's very keen to establish strong communities per realm, but is also "cautiously opening new servers to meet demand."
If you've already reserved a character name and chosen Herod as your realm, go and pick somewhere else. If you don't, it's likely playing WoW Classic on launch day will prove impossible. Anyone yet to sign up should pick whichever realm Blizzard is recommending at the time.
As Eurogamer reports, in the run up to launch Blizzard is allowing players to reserve a character name and choose a preferred realm to play in. The problem is, one realm in particular is proving to be extremely popular. It's called Herod and there's so many players selecting it Blizzard believes the login queue will be "in excess of 10,000 players."
A login queue simply means waiting to be allowed to login to the server to play. If there's a handful of players waiting ahead of you, then there's time to go make a coffee. However, 10,000+ players in the queue and you might as well go play something else and try again another day.
Blizzard won't solve the problem by increasing the number of players each server can handle. They could, but rather than solving it would just delay the same problem. Instead, Blizzard is calling upon players to choose another realm to play in. A plea was posted on Battle.net by community manager Kaivax requesting this:
Kaivax also points out that the realm population estimates of "Low, Medium, High" are set at 2019 levels rather than 2006 levels, meaning many more players per server today can and will be handled. Blizzard intends to run WoW Classic for years, so it's very keen to establish strong communities per realm, but is also "cautiously opening new servers to meet demand."
If you've already reserved a character name and chosen Herod as your realm, go and pick somewhere else. If you don't, it's likely playing WoW Classic on launch day will prove impossible. Anyone yet to sign up should pick whichever realm Blizzard is recommending at the time.