MMOexpsitefans's blog
I believe a root cause of this problem (out of blizzards initial server need estimate fuck up) was too much overemphasis on the excellence of PvP servers out of those to buy gold classic wow that played private servers, streamers, or that were try hard WOW players and this also caused far too many casuals who would have been better off satisfied to a PvE server having an experience similar to what you said to instead roll PvP because that is what they thought was"the cool thing to do." Then when these WOW players could not endure the heat of p2 in addition to the spans try hard WOW players would go to (and I don't fault them, playing casually in these circumstances could not have been fun) they began to whine of blizzard, Blizzard responded with poorly thought out, rather frankly garbage solutions, these WOW players left and umsubbed and thus faction imbalances and the cascade of perishing servers were created.
I believe Stalagg is good evidence of this, it was the other server than Herod which has been adopted by the reddit community and that I believe OP's post essentially details what I claimed. I believe that it would've been interesting to have servers stratified by perceived participant skill/dedication tags from the start in addition to this rulesets ie PvP, PvE etc.. I think if far more WOW players had simply rolled PvE or rolled a Casual tagged server similar to what you did from the start the overall server health and total player pleasure would be much better. All of this with the caveat assuming Blizzard would have made an estimate somewhere inside the exact same zip code of the actual demand and published an appropriate number of servers initially of course.
I think that the challenge is orderly. Vanilla had several mechanics that encouraged planet pvp and involvement, but I believe you have seen its effect on a minute maxed mindset. I think unless you discover a group of people who simply pvp, and nothing else. Adding raiding as a secondary item (because who needs wbuffs to clear articles actually ). You'll have this situation. Why do you think this in TBC, wbuffs ware eliminated, and wbosses were largely removed esp later on. With PvP being transferred to instanced events which attempts to make things fair and not cause people to fear migrate due to imbalance in the overworld. But then they had to produce things such as the MoP farm along with WoD farmville together with modifications to raid consumes and careers like feasts and flask cauldrons.
I believe sadly, you need to choose, both your guild is willing to go without wbuffs and be the little faction on a vast majority enemy faction server to PvP. Or you reside less or, either with or without queues. Unless it becomes WOW Classic+, the majority of WOW Classic mechanics will indicate that if you are worried with PvE progression like wbuffs and first week AQ, then PvE servers using a huge horde population is going to be your go cheap classic wow gold to. Or as when the week AQ40 pvp server is understood, you say, to jump servers.
I believe Stalagg is good evidence of this, it was the other server than Herod which has been adopted by the reddit community and that I believe OP's post essentially details what I claimed. I believe that it would've been interesting to have servers stratified by perceived participant skill/dedication tags from the start in addition to this rulesets ie PvP, PvE etc.. I think if far more WOW players had simply rolled PvE or rolled a Casual tagged server similar to what you did from the start the overall server health and total player pleasure would be much better. All of this with the caveat assuming Blizzard would have made an estimate somewhere inside the exact same zip code of the actual demand and published an appropriate number of servers initially of course.
I think that the challenge is orderly. Vanilla had several mechanics that encouraged planet pvp and involvement, but I believe you have seen its effect on a minute maxed mindset. I think unless you discover a group of people who simply pvp, and nothing else. Adding raiding as a secondary item (because who needs wbuffs to clear articles actually ). You'll have this situation. Why do you think this in TBC, wbuffs ware eliminated, and wbosses were largely removed esp later on. With PvP being transferred to instanced events which attempts to make things fair and not cause people to fear migrate due to imbalance in the overworld. But then they had to produce things such as the MoP farm along with WoD farmville together with modifications to raid consumes and careers like feasts and flask cauldrons.
I believe sadly, you need to choose, both your guild is willing to go without wbuffs and be the little faction on a vast majority enemy faction server to PvP. Or you reside less or, either with or without queues. Unless it becomes WOW Classic+, the majority of WOW Classic mechanics will indicate that if you are worried with PvE progression like wbuffs and first week AQ, then PvE servers using a huge horde population is going to be your go cheap classic wow gold to. Or as when the week AQ40 pvp server is understood, you say, to jump servers.
About CPU AI being able to adjust to a play calling, I'm really pumped. I truly hope they addressed the clock direction issues. I won too many Madden 20 coins because the CPU did not know when to spike and should call a TO. On my experience, CPU"corrects" better to play calling, even with audibles properly, based on issue. On All-Madden I now play, AI fakes me out fairly well, and literally 100% of times call coverage types that are correct forcing me to audible a lot.... It spikes knowingly and utilizes TOs very efficiently. Also challenging plays, whenever possible.
AI NEVER spikes the ball and their timeouts are called by them. It's really beyond stupid. I run a simulation just franchise and my group occasionally only runs the soccer times in the last minute of Madden NFL 21 despite being down by a touchdown.For me they do a quick rush up then call a time out and its just like really? That means you can call a timeout with 30 seconds left when a first down was achieved by your opponent whilst being dismissed but you do not have simple time management abilities? Its gloomy were in 2020 and the AI are not /were not programmed to differ.
The new Face of the Franchise sounds really cool, I'm sad that you secured into. It sounds ehh.. Still not amazing. I expect we have a combine, that would be a little sad w/o it. I figured you didn't have an option of continuing the QB path. It sounded to me like you HAD to select either WR or RB. I don't think so, it is probably"based on which sort of QB you select, you could be able to change positions" kinda thing. Maybe it's only switch out of HS and... do whatever in college.
It'll be exactly the same as last year. 4 more Madden NFL - some renderings, back into the franchise mode in which the same bullshit message rips you Mut 20 coins for sale from the team to get underperforming even though you did not take 1 snap because you are the backup QB. EA did not improve Madden NFL 21 whatsoever - it's fine marketing. New career style sounds promising. Hopefully it doesn't jump through high school and school in just 3 Madden NFL. We will need to play a full school season decades of college. Then you get to pick from 1 of 10 colleges. You don't play full seasons however, you play four playoff Madden NFL to get a opportunity.
AI NEVER spikes the ball and their timeouts are called by them. It's really beyond stupid. I run a simulation just franchise and my group occasionally only runs the soccer times in the last minute of Madden NFL 21 despite being down by a touchdown.For me they do a quick rush up then call a time out and its just like really? That means you can call a timeout with 30 seconds left when a first down was achieved by your opponent whilst being dismissed but you do not have simple time management abilities? Its gloomy were in 2020 and the AI are not /were not programmed to differ.
The new Face of the Franchise sounds really cool, I'm sad that you secured into. It sounds ehh.. Still not amazing. I expect we have a combine, that would be a little sad w/o it. I figured you didn't have an option of continuing the QB path. It sounded to me like you HAD to select either WR or RB. I don't think so, it is probably"based on which sort of QB you select, you could be able to change positions" kinda thing. Maybe it's only switch out of HS and... do whatever in college.
It'll be exactly the same as last year. 4 more Madden NFL - some renderings, back into the franchise mode in which the same bullshit message rips you Mut 20 coins for sale from the team to get underperforming even though you did not take 1 snap because you are the backup QB. EA did not improve Madden NFL 21 whatsoever - it's fine marketing. New career style sounds promising. Hopefully it doesn't jump through high school and school in just 3 Madden NFL. We will need to play a full school season decades of college. Then you get to pick from 1 of 10 colleges. You don't play full seasons however, you play four playoff Madden NFL to get a opportunity.
Even in the NFC championship game where the 49ers ran all over the Packers, it was more of a fact that they had a dominant offensive Madden 20 coins line and I also still had to pass seven times. The 49ers did not place a punter at the quarterback position to acquire off a faster hand - they were simply better and so they overpower the other team. Which is something that doesn't occur in Madden because all the time you may see 70 total defensive lineman plow over a 92 offensive lineman because he gets the animation.
There should be some penalty to this. Taking a snap is not the simplest thing although I'm not saying do not permit this. Perhaps the play can't be seen by the punter or they snaps often or the turn the incorrect way handing away the ball. If I were able to afford not turning the incorrect way for handoffs when I was playing football I'm sure it could be managed by a professional athlete too. And taking a snap is tougher than taking one. The downside of placing a punter in at midnight ought to be that they'll be at throwing the ball worse.
I mean certain but this is wee football. Having the ability to call two plays in the huddle and murdering one while understanding verbiage of a NFL team for a man that probably has never played anything other than punter or kicker in a higher level is probably pretty tough while trying to manage your ability to kick and punt at the maximum degree. Therefore it would be clear if a play telephone was misunderstood by them or forgot how to go for a play. Taking a lengthy snap isn't simple but neither is and beneath centre snap of an nfl center that they have no practice period. Throwing a ball is the least of a punters worry when they had been thrust to a QB position so that they should not have the ability to run an NFL crime, although I get what you are saying.
You have the right to do whatever you desire. Does that make it realistic? Does that create gameplay? Punters at qb will be fair game, if this were not a simulation game then sure. But name one time in NFL history where a team set their punter in at QB multiple times. Until you are able to do that, this is an issue. MUT is far from a style with aggressive madden. I agree with what you're saying. However, Competitve Madden is different from Offline/sim folks.
It's been this way since the beginning of online play. Like back to buy mut coins in the days with such and the Nano's. But us people who desire the sim encounter play Madden nfl otherwise. It's like going to play NBA 2k and hoping to play sim style in Rec, or My team. It just is not happening.But it shouldn't be that way. Madden prides itself and this can be its game mode that is promoted. Clearly every video game will get exploits. But the point is that this is allegedly a simulation football match and at its greatest level it does not even remotely resemble what we see occurring on Sundays.
There should be some penalty to this. Taking a snap is not the simplest thing although I'm not saying do not permit this. Perhaps the play can't be seen by the punter or they snaps often or the turn the incorrect way handing away the ball. If I were able to afford not turning the incorrect way for handoffs when I was playing football I'm sure it could be managed by a professional athlete too. And taking a snap is tougher than taking one. The downside of placing a punter in at midnight ought to be that they'll be at throwing the ball worse.
I mean certain but this is wee football. Having the ability to call two plays in the huddle and murdering one while understanding verbiage of a NFL team for a man that probably has never played anything other than punter or kicker in a higher level is probably pretty tough while trying to manage your ability to kick and punt at the maximum degree. Therefore it would be clear if a play telephone was misunderstood by them or forgot how to go for a play. Taking a lengthy snap isn't simple but neither is and beneath centre snap of an nfl center that they have no practice period. Throwing a ball is the least of a punters worry when they had been thrust to a QB position so that they should not have the ability to run an NFL crime, although I get what you are saying.
You have the right to do whatever you desire. Does that make it realistic? Does that create gameplay? Punters at qb will be fair game, if this were not a simulation game then sure. But name one time in NFL history where a team set their punter in at QB multiple times. Until you are able to do that, this is an issue. MUT is far from a style with aggressive madden. I agree with what you're saying. However, Competitve Madden is different from Offline/sim folks.
It's been this way since the beginning of online play. Like back to buy mut coins in the days with such and the Nano's. But us people who desire the sim encounter play Madden nfl otherwise. It's like going to play NBA 2k and hoping to play sim style in Rec, or My team. It just is not happening.But it shouldn't be that way. Madden prides itself and this can be its game mode that is promoted. Clearly every video game will get exploits. But the point is that this is allegedly a simulation football match and at its greatest level it does not even remotely resemble what we see occurring on Sundays.
I know Runescape isn't focused on Combat at all OSRS gold if you don't want to but there are practically no games that I know of who are like Runescape inside this regard. Before anyone says this, I'm not asking for a 0% battle game or a game where there's not any battle. What I mean by not the focus, is that the developers intend some end gameplay or game to have no combat. Similar to Runescape.
Quests, where combat is included by more than half of them to varying degrees are liked by A lot of the content. Like Runescape. The developers make content focused around Combat. Arguably where battle is of it most of it is tied to combat regardless of what, but there's content. Thats exactly what I mean. Developer intended a lot of it, and end game material where Combat is not the focus. That's what I'm searching for. Perhaps not the"You CAN go into any sport and just jump around you know?" No. Since the programmer creates content around 17, that's not exactly what I am talking about. So that doesn't match my criteria.
This, there are personal servers running versions of RuneScape. How populated is it? I understand having population isn't much of a variable if your getting"fun currently" but I am interested still. As someone who's never had a chance to play with that match. There's really 2 different variations of RuneScape, because RuneScape was revamped following the success of WoW. There is 1 main populated job for every version of RuneScape, in addition to a few much smaller projects. Active population numbers are difficult to estimate for both, but you can check their websites and see that the RuneScape player count. The version that is older usually sits around 600-800 RuneScape players afk, and also the newer one hits around 1-1.5k RuneScape players logged into 2-3 characters at the Same Time
I would not suggest it to some RuneScape player to buy RS gold, as the community is inactive. Swg Legends is the edition that is active and updated. They hold pretty regular events for new and returning RuneScape players where you can meet team members, find guilds, ask questions, and find some solid starting gear. The team on this project is very hit-or-miss, though it's gotten much better within the last year. Certainly worth checking either version out, as it. A lot people are looking for the following SWG.
Quests, where combat is included by more than half of them to varying degrees are liked by A lot of the content. Like Runescape. The developers make content focused around Combat. Arguably where battle is of it most of it is tied to combat regardless of what, but there's content. Thats exactly what I mean. Developer intended a lot of it, and end game material where Combat is not the focus. That's what I'm searching for. Perhaps not the"You CAN go into any sport and just jump around you know?" No. Since the programmer creates content around 17, that's not exactly what I am talking about. So that doesn't match my criteria.
This, there are personal servers running versions of RuneScape. How populated is it? I understand having population isn't much of a variable if your getting"fun currently" but I am interested still. As someone who's never had a chance to play with that match. There's really 2 different variations of RuneScape, because RuneScape was revamped following the success of WoW. There is 1 main populated job for every version of RuneScape, in addition to a few much smaller projects. Active population numbers are difficult to estimate for both, but you can check their websites and see that the RuneScape player count. The version that is older usually sits around 600-800 RuneScape players afk, and also the newer one hits around 1-1.5k RuneScape players logged into 2-3 characters at the Same Time
I would not suggest it to some RuneScape player to buy RS gold, as the community is inactive. Swg Legends is the edition that is active and updated. They hold pretty regular events for new and returning RuneScape players where you can meet team members, find guilds, ask questions, and find some solid starting gear. The team on this project is very hit-or-miss, though it's gotten much better within the last year. Certainly worth checking either version out, as it. A lot people are looking for the following SWG.