Ah, yeah, a great deal of people tend to wow classic gold overlook how private servers came to be or how net was a little different back in the day, since nowdays datamining and things get posted throughout the web as soon as first public beta starts, now we've got so much more data on WoW Classichead and similar websites. Which wasn't completely the situation back then. And servers did not only appear to be because someone leaked Blizzards server program. They have been created by observing reverse engineering client, WoW Classic and sniffing packets between game and server. And back in the twenty five days, developers of private servers were a means too busy getting things that is fundamental in, to have enough time to focus on every single detail. And also a lot of things are little harder to learn, like chances were not exactly known.

What went on in backend of Blizzard servers wasn't known and developers had to guessthey simply put placeholder values , which implemented or not got recorded, match changed and till it was too late. And obviously, our memory generally tends to be not that perfect , especially on the details. Not to mention outside influences like personal servers, which never were and likely won't be accurate. Though launch of Classic will provide them helping hand there, since it will be opportunity to sniff out packets, do datamining,. But it's funny behind this gorgeous facade players see and love, there's surprising amount of things happening they never see cheap classic wow gold hiding under. As I said, it will be interesting to observer people understanding how much they recall incorrectly.

You mentioned how "Fandom is under new leadership and currently re-evaluating the company's strategy and priorities", and ask us to RuneScape gold bear with the company ?C but as this is the only example we have of its new approach, and it's alienating even more of your users, I think you really need to refocus as soon as possible on re-engaging with your editors on their own terms, and ask yourself what the underlying problems are in your company ethos that continue to drive away the people who freely add value to the company as you go forward. This is absolutely vital, and Fandom is almost unique in this respect (despite whatever consultants or executives from other business sectors might say ?C collaboratively crowdsourcing your content needs a focus on listening to and supporting your editors as your top goal, and the rest will follow).

This applies across the entire site, but in the case of this wiki, moving forward, are you willing to listen to the people who are here now? You've deleted all of the user pages to get a "fresh start" ?C the same thing could be achieved by restoring the pages, then blanking them (or better still putting a template explaining why they've all been archived, and putting a positive message for the future) ?C this would allow new editors to view the page histories if they wanted to, and would prevent thousands of redlinks which would just give the wiki a "ghost-town" feel. You also deleted the Forum thread that discussed the fork ?C by trying to hide this you're perpetuating the problems that led to this point ?C one positive way forward would be to keep it ?C show that you're not the bad guys ?C and again put your own message about what happened, wishing well the people who have left after writing so much content for buy OSRS gold the site (Fandom owes them that at least), but looking to the future for this wiki and encouraging new editors to come forward.