I meanit sounds as if you're gonna need to fight them where they are supposed to guard your system. You want to defend your own body more readily as compared to individuals being able to EVE Mobile ISK travel more freely. At a mobile game, it seems like travel would be more significant than allowing groups of gamers to effectively block off large portions of the map so only they can play there. It seems just like without gate camping your corps might have to work harder and more actively to defend what you have, is that a bad thing?

200 cruisers come into your house system and shoot off your structure - that is fine. You set up a timer for repair and form a fleet for a fight next time. No gatecamping needed for that.

Sadly this stage is missed and its a single problem unfortunately. Afk in low sec doesn't matter imo. Allowing that in null long-term would destroy sov/econ equilibrium. Additionally I dont understand the expectation of getting any safety at all in a region named"null security". Of all of the ways they could have described regions in Eve, the one that they felt was the best describes the anticipation of safety. I think low/high sec can continue to offer a livable space for EVE Echoes ISK For Sale more risk averse players.

What is obvious to you doesnt make it clearly objectively. The fact that people are leaving ways it isnt evident there's need for EVE Mobile ISK this hardcore game match you want You truly have no way of actually proving your point since it requires evidence that wouldn't be able for months when the fan base has remained or shrunk together with the chart positions for this game.I see some folks departing, sure, and being vocal about it. I see a lot more in game and enjoying themselves.

While I largely agree, I'd love to bring that lowsec ought to be secure as long as you're at gates/stations or warping between them. Outside ratting/mining or whatever, yeah not safe, but lowsec should be partly secure. Autopilot shouldn't even operate in NULL IMO. Attempt to Autopilot into Null and it ought to just leave you in the gate ready to leap into Null, at which you should be secure since you're at a gate.

I disagree. Low sec is just that, Low Security! That by definition signifies concord will set up some attempt, but not a great deal. Same reason why gate camping in low requires more effort than it's in null. If I want to camp in low which means I need minimum a committed tank and EVE Echoes ISK For Sale a few friends to help seal the deal quickly, and then deal with the offender timer. In null I could by itself sit at a gate and become a dick all day.