I was wondering whether Sir Amik Varze is really a knight. I know that the White Knights (By Guthix they have a better name than the Kinshra) is a political and military organization. In feudal societies (yes, RuneScape does not pay any attention whatsoever to OSRS Items how countries were run or the size of their land... areas are too small...) A knight is the lowest level, whereas the monarch is on the top, only to be beaten by an Emperor.

Amik could rule in the king’s horse steed in the event that he wishes to. That would also make Burthorpe into a principality. (I imagine that the principality is vast and the town is just the capital).

As for the Kinshra they were exiled the Kinshra from Falador and the mountains (I'm thinking there's a huge mountain range separating Asgarnia and Misthalin from the Wilderness... it is odd that a single mountain exists standing on its own) therefore, I'm guessing it makes Daquarius, the chief of the Kinshra, an eminent marquis.

He is the lord of the title, which makes sense. Why is Sir Amik considered to be a knight, when Daquarius is a Lord? What do you think? Is it possible for a knight to run the kingdom as the ruler? Sorry for the non-related parts. I just copied and pasted it from a post that I wrote on RSOF.

The grave situation seems ridiculous to me. The argument is that grave stones won’t be blessed if thieves take your possessions. I don't see the problem in Buy RuneScape 2007 Gold this particular situation, regardless of the fact that it was the same pre 07 but you didn’t have a six minute grace period before you could pick up your items.