EA doesn't care for people that are not investors. Removing Kaepernick's name from tunes in Madden 2 years in a row reveals it. Companies do not need you to defend themlet their lawyers do that work. But we shouldn't praise a company for attaining the absolute bare minimum. You are not trendy and moral for thanking companies for not spitting on you. We ought to praise companies who show patterns of positivity. Feel free to disagree, but don't act like this specific instance is this incredibly complicated morally-grey circumstance. I mean I believed there were pretty strict regulations on whose titles and likeliness can be used in Madden. Just like Belicheck and Madden 21 coins Payton aren't in Madden since they are not part of the NFLCA and that is who EA includes a contract with. They might need to cover Kap if his title is utilized and therefore are probably avoiding that. That and Kap is not just welcome from the NFL planet (not speaking about fans) anymore.

They backpeddled and apologized when they were called out. They don't have rights to Kap's likeness in the game however they could cite him in the tune (as they have plenty of additional public figures in other songs). The simple fact that they did this two years in a row indicates it was not an innocent oversight but a real decision to collaborate using a essentially racist act of collusion inside the NFL. I am not defending a company. I am not saying EA is some bastion of social justice. Many people generally (not merely reddit) can not see beyond black and white. That is why negativity floats to the best in most social websites. That is why negativity floats to the top in most social websites. This is a significant element. Youtube for one has done research, because it is a huge part of their company and they would like to know it. There has been testimony to congress about it that I've watched but can't find at this time. What they want is engagement and the more negatively styled something is the more folks will click it as it comes up on your own recommendations.

Companies don't want you to defend themlet their lawyers do that work. "Firms do not need you to defend them", but attacking businesses when they are doing the proper thing is necessary and productive?It does not matter whether it is for PR reasons, they're still increasing awareness to this problem and hurting nobody by doing this procedure. Meanwhile the men and women who see this as an chance to attack are just perpetuating a negative atmosphere of constant complaining. It is not so much about"defending companies" but about attacking this naturally negativity. So you're really only adding to the man's debate by doing exactly what he described. They are not doing anything however. They simply published a statement filled with empty rhetoric. You understand what doing something is? Not creating another Madden game because the NFL penalized players like Kaepernick for carrying a knee. That would be impressive. But we all know that's not what's going to happen.

The fact that people here are really behaving like this can be a meaningful gesture is indeed fucking baffling. EA literally moved out of its way to wash his name from their games two decades right, but this thread is making it seem like they have contributed millions. It is pure fucking insanity. It's the very definition of slacktivism. It'd be more fair when they had said nothing in any way. Instead, they are gonna push out a bullshit PR statement about how they stand with the black community and then in a few months turn around and sell a product featuring an organization that has a history of stifling and penalizing black voices. I never said"Let us strike a company for doing the right thing." Actions speak louder than words. You can always be optimistic of cheap Mut 21 coins matters looking up, which I frequently am. If your buddy hurts your feelings, then they have to regain your trust. You do not thank them every time from then on if they're being nice.