User blogs
Tag Search
Tag search results for: "wikibit"
coinbase and Robinhood are two of the most popular places to trade cryptocurrencies, but which one is better for YOU？ The answer depends on YOUr needs, especially on how much crypto trading you intend to do and the costs youre willing to pay.To get more news about Huobi Global, you can visit wikibit.com official website.
Coinbase and Robinhood may appeal to different kinds of traders, though theres likely some significant overlap. Coinbase is a cryptocurrency exchange that targets traders deeply in the world of digital currencies. In contrast, Robinhood is a trading app that allows users to buy and sell stocks, ETFs, options and some types of crypto for no out-of-pocket cost.
The cost structure at Coinbase and Robinhood are significantly different, and it doesn‘t help matters that Coinbase purposely obscures much of its fee structure from potential customers (though it does disclose them before you actually place a trade). That said, Robinhood is not exactly straightforward about how it’s compensated either.
The fee structure at Robinhood is simple, relative to Coinbase‘s. In keeping with the broker’s “no commissions” model for stock and options, you won‘t pay any cost directly out of your pocket for buying and selling crypto. Instead, the cost of trading is effectively rolled into a spread markup on the trade. So you’ll effectively pay more when you‘re buying and receive less when you’re selling than if you received the best market price at the moment of your trade.
Coinbase‘s fee structure is confusing, to say the least. Not only does it charge varying fees based on how much you purchase, it has a basic tier of service and a pro tier, each of which have different fees. And recently Coinbase began to obscure the fees for its basic service, making it difficult for prospective customers to see how much they’re paying (Spoiler alert: prices are high if youre buying just a little bit of crypto on the basic tier.)
For smaller transactions, youll pay a spread mark-up of 0.5 percent of your trade value plus a flat fee based on the size of your transaction:At the lowest levels, around $10, you‘ll pay a fee that eats up nearly 10 percent of your purchase. But even at $200, you’re still paying a hefty 1.5 percent or so. And that‘s on top of the 0.5 spread mark-up that’s already factored into the purchase or sale price.
At purchase amounts above $200, youre still paying that 0.5 percent spread mark-up while a variable fee depends on your source of funds:If you opt to use Coinbase Pro, the company‘s higher service tier, you’ll be able to score lower overall fees, even if you‘re trading with lower amounts. Coinbase is clearer about these fees but the structure is scaled and depends on whether you’re adding liquidity (where the commission ranges from 0 to 0.5 percent of trade value) or taking liquidity (with commissions ranging from 0.04 to 0.5 percent).
Advantage: Robinhood, for the simplicity of its fee structure, even if its disclosure is no better than the one provided by Coinbase.
Available coins
Coinbase supports trading in more than 90 different cryptocurrencies, including the biggies such as bitcoin, Ethereum, Cardano, SOLana, DOGEcoin and more. So you‘re likely to find what you’re looking for and even plenty that you aren‘t. Sure, Coinbase doesn’t offer thousands of other much smaller digital currencies, but that wont matter for almost anyone but niche traders.
In contrast, Robinhood allows users to trade in just seven digital currencies: Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin SV, Dogecoin, Ethereum, Ethereum Classic and Litecoin. However, the app does give traders access to real-time data on these cryptos and nine others. The company has said that it‘s working on adding more coins to its platform, but it’s not clear when that could occur.
When it comes to the type of securities being offered, Coinbase is all crypto, all the time. If you want anything else — stocks, ETFs, options — youll have to find it elsewhere.
In contrast, Robinhood offers a wider range of securities, including stocks, options, ETFs and cryptocurrencies, though it doesnt offer bonds or mutual funds. Still, the app will reel in plenty of traders with what it does offer, so it can appeal to a wide audience even with a shallower pool of crypto.If you‘re looking to handle custody of your crypto assets yourself, Coinbase is your pick here. The exchange offers its own wallet, but you can also take custody of the assets yourself through your own wallet. So you can pick the solution that fits your needs best, whether you’re looking for a hardware wallet or software wallet or you just want to leave it with Coinbase for trading.
Robinhood does not offer a wallet, so traders will be forced to hold their crypto with the broker, as they would for stocks and other assets. The company has said it intends to offer a crypto wallet but hasnt laid out a timeframe for doing so.
Coinbase and Robinhood may appeal to different kinds of traders, though theres likely some significant overlap. Coinbase is a cryptocurrency exchange that targets traders deeply in the world of digital currencies. In contrast, Robinhood is a trading app that allows users to buy and sell stocks, ETFs, options and some types of crypto for no out-of-pocket cost.
The cost structure at Coinbase and Robinhood are significantly different, and it doesn‘t help matters that Coinbase purposely obscures much of its fee structure from potential customers (though it does disclose them before you actually place a trade). That said, Robinhood is not exactly straightforward about how it’s compensated either.
The fee structure at Robinhood is simple, relative to Coinbase‘s. In keeping with the broker’s “no commissions” model for stock and options, you won‘t pay any cost directly out of your pocket for buying and selling crypto. Instead, the cost of trading is effectively rolled into a spread markup on the trade. So you’ll effectively pay more when you‘re buying and receive less when you’re selling than if you received the best market price at the moment of your trade.
Coinbase‘s fee structure is confusing, to say the least. Not only does it charge varying fees based on how much you purchase, it has a basic tier of service and a pro tier, each of which have different fees. And recently Coinbase began to obscure the fees for its basic service, making it difficult for prospective customers to see how much they’re paying (Spoiler alert: prices are high if youre buying just a little bit of crypto on the basic tier.)
For smaller transactions, youll pay a spread mark-up of 0.5 percent of your trade value plus a flat fee based on the size of your transaction:At the lowest levels, around $10, you‘ll pay a fee that eats up nearly 10 percent of your purchase. But even at $200, you’re still paying a hefty 1.5 percent or so. And that‘s on top of the 0.5 spread mark-up that’s already factored into the purchase or sale price.
At purchase amounts above $200, youre still paying that 0.5 percent spread mark-up while a variable fee depends on your source of funds:If you opt to use Coinbase Pro, the company‘s higher service tier, you’ll be able to score lower overall fees, even if you‘re trading with lower amounts. Coinbase is clearer about these fees but the structure is scaled and depends on whether you’re adding liquidity (where the commission ranges from 0 to 0.5 percent of trade value) or taking liquidity (with commissions ranging from 0.04 to 0.5 percent).
Advantage: Robinhood, for the simplicity of its fee structure, even if its disclosure is no better than the one provided by Coinbase.
Available coins
Coinbase supports trading in more than 90 different cryptocurrencies, including the biggies such as bitcoin, Ethereum, Cardano, SOLana, DOGEcoin and more. So you‘re likely to find what you’re looking for and even plenty that you aren‘t. Sure, Coinbase doesn’t offer thousands of other much smaller digital currencies, but that wont matter for almost anyone but niche traders.
In contrast, Robinhood allows users to trade in just seven digital currencies: Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin SV, Dogecoin, Ethereum, Ethereum Classic and Litecoin. However, the app does give traders access to real-time data on these cryptos and nine others. The company has said that it‘s working on adding more coins to its platform, but it’s not clear when that could occur.
When it comes to the type of securities being offered, Coinbase is all crypto, all the time. If you want anything else — stocks, ETFs, options — youll have to find it elsewhere.
In contrast, Robinhood offers a wider range of securities, including stocks, options, ETFs and cryptocurrencies, though it doesnt offer bonds or mutual funds. Still, the app will reel in plenty of traders with what it does offer, so it can appeal to a wide audience even with a shallower pool of crypto.If you‘re looking to handle custody of your crypto assets yourself, Coinbase is your pick here. The exchange offers its own wallet, but you can also take custody of the assets yourself through your own wallet. So you can pick the solution that fits your needs best, whether you’re looking for a hardware wallet or software wallet or you just want to leave it with Coinbase for trading.
Robinhood does not offer a wallet, so traders will be forced to hold their crypto with the broker, as they would for stocks and other assets. The company has said it intends to offer a crypto wallet but hasnt laid out a timeframe for doing so.
El Salvadors Bitcoin embrace may be a domino for some emerging markets, but a fierce rival to the BTC is also coming to the fore. Macro strategist Ben Emons explains.To get more news about Blockchain Project, you can visit wikibit.com official website.
El Salvador was challenged on the first day of the new Bitcoin law coming in effect. The Chivo Wallet — which allows consumers to purchase goods and services in Bitcoin — temporarily shut down. While a technical glitch can happen, the impact on Bitcoin was dramatic with a spillover to El Salvador bonds, which jumped and caused the yield curve to sharply invert. It was an unwelcome sign that a wide use of Bitcoin may have major implications for the Salvadoran economy and the governments ability to pay interest on the debt.
Bitcoin is now a currency to El Salvador, and the country — if it so wishes — could use Bitcoin exclusively to purchase goods and services. But relying on Bitcoin for commerce means the economy would be subject to liquidity and volatility of Bitcoin that cannot be controlled with domestic monetary policy. It reminds of previous emerging market crises such as in Argentina and Venezuela, where a foreign currency (the U.S. dollar) dominated domestic activity to such an extent that a shortage of foreign currency could cause economic paralysis.
In the case of El Salvador, a wide adoption of Bitcoin is limited to the amount purchased by the Salvadoran government. Other central banks are following a different route. A recent initiative in the Asia Pacific to pilot a cross-border test of a central bank digital currency is a noteworthy alternative to El Salvadors move to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender.
Australia announced it is participating together with the central banks of Malaysia, Singapore, and South Africa in “Project Dunbar” to develop prototype platforms to enhance international digital settlement of currencies and securities. Such platforms could enhance the speed of settlements and delivery of securities, currency, and commodities, thereby drastically lowering the transaction costs between financial institutions and intermediaries.
But such is not likely achieved without more volatility of Bitcoin and other crypto assets. The price swings indicate that the crypto market is trading with a much closer connection with physical and financial assets, as an expression that two worlds — crypto and global financial markets — are becoming increasingly interconnected.
The fact that El Salvadors bonds were impacted by the change in the value of Bitcoin means that the financial system is moving faster to a reality of digital payments, transactions and issuance. But there are other reasons why the crypto universe is shaking. The boom in NFTs — non-fungible tokens — is sparking volatility in Ethereum gas prices, where gas fees for NFT-trading have hit a new high.
A sudden interest by crowds of “meme traders” for NFT has driven demand for Ethereum in high gear to enable NFT trading. As a result, the social sentiment ETF — BUZZ — is positively correlated with the Grayscale Ethereum Trust. Such correlations and connections between Bitcoin, crypto and financial assets did not exist before. The financial relationship between Bitcoin and El Salvador bonds, Ethereum gas prices and social sentiment stocks is strengthening because digital assets are rapidly embraced by institutional and retail investors as a compelling, alternative asset to diversify portfolios invested in conventional stocks and bonds. Yet, it is a logical output of a financial eco-system evolving into digitalization of markets that includes a fast growing, newly emerging digital derivatives industry.
For the near term, Bitcoins ability to rebound is not as stunning as before. Markets cannot ignore that crypto is a necessary means to transform existing trading technology to a next level.
El Salvador was challenged on the first day of the new Bitcoin law coming in effect. The Chivo Wallet — which allows consumers to purchase goods and services in Bitcoin — temporarily shut down. While a technical glitch can happen, the impact on Bitcoin was dramatic with a spillover to El Salvador bonds, which jumped and caused the yield curve to sharply invert. It was an unwelcome sign that a wide use of Bitcoin may have major implications for the Salvadoran economy and the governments ability to pay interest on the debt.
Bitcoin is now a currency to El Salvador, and the country — if it so wishes — could use Bitcoin exclusively to purchase goods and services. But relying on Bitcoin for commerce means the economy would be subject to liquidity and volatility of Bitcoin that cannot be controlled with domestic monetary policy. It reminds of previous emerging market crises such as in Argentina and Venezuela, where a foreign currency (the U.S. dollar) dominated domestic activity to such an extent that a shortage of foreign currency could cause economic paralysis.
In the case of El Salvador, a wide adoption of Bitcoin is limited to the amount purchased by the Salvadoran government. Other central banks are following a different route. A recent initiative in the Asia Pacific to pilot a cross-border test of a central bank digital currency is a noteworthy alternative to El Salvadors move to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender.
Australia announced it is participating together with the central banks of Malaysia, Singapore, and South Africa in “Project Dunbar” to develop prototype platforms to enhance international digital settlement of currencies and securities. Such platforms could enhance the speed of settlements and delivery of securities, currency, and commodities, thereby drastically lowering the transaction costs between financial institutions and intermediaries.
But such is not likely achieved without more volatility of Bitcoin and other crypto assets. The price swings indicate that the crypto market is trading with a much closer connection with physical and financial assets, as an expression that two worlds — crypto and global financial markets — are becoming increasingly interconnected.
The fact that El Salvadors bonds were impacted by the change in the value of Bitcoin means that the financial system is moving faster to a reality of digital payments, transactions and issuance. But there are other reasons why the crypto universe is shaking. The boom in NFTs — non-fungible tokens — is sparking volatility in Ethereum gas prices, where gas fees for NFT-trading have hit a new high.
A sudden interest by crowds of “meme traders” for NFT has driven demand for Ethereum in high gear to enable NFT trading. As a result, the social sentiment ETF — BUZZ — is positively correlated with the Grayscale Ethereum Trust. Such correlations and connections between Bitcoin, crypto and financial assets did not exist before. The financial relationship between Bitcoin and El Salvador bonds, Ethereum gas prices and social sentiment stocks is strengthening because digital assets are rapidly embraced by institutional and retail investors as a compelling, alternative asset to diversify portfolios invested in conventional stocks and bonds. Yet, it is a logical output of a financial eco-system evolving into digitalization of markets that includes a fast growing, newly emerging digital derivatives industry.
For the near term, Bitcoins ability to rebound is not as stunning as before. Markets cannot ignore that crypto is a necessary means to transform existing trading technology to a next level.