such as say, should we mention it a game of RS gold year over something if people have fun playing something such as fiends that are greatest. . .skyrim? Fun is not something which can be measured and there is no formula for it, judging a game purely on such a metric is fucking stupid.Well you are judging a game based on the quantity of skill it requires that is completely random, pointless and hypocritical. A game can take a lot of skill and be totally unenjoyable trash. What do we have to say if a game is good or not? Games are entertainment in order that they are great if they're fun and enjoyable and if they are they're bad games. Who plays a game that claims it is a good game and isn't fun?

And what standard or rule states that the battle has to be more than"clicking and waiting"? The developing player base appears to disagree... The MMO community is so fast to assert yet make no sense. Nothing to judge how great a match is put and can be measured on paper. That is not the right way to go about it whatsoever. The only way is to state the"best" would be exactly what the majority enjoys.

It's definitely not at the top of the genre but it's a good game. It's the best for sure for me ! Throwing out the sum of skill creating a game good triggered me. It is a poor spectrum perspective on things... If SWTOR and GW2 really have a greater playerbase I'm surprised, I played those years and years ago and guessed they were now dead. Also runescape is good enough to become mobile. Warcraft is similar to cheap RuneScape gold in regards to membership and it is more costly. And yet people like it.