van cleef perlee Tiger Eye bracelet first shop from fuadiskws's blog
Reactions to the Supreme Court
No surprise: Reactions to the Supreme Court decision as expected
It didn take long for the first reactions to the Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act to start trickling in. Here a sampling of how some health organizationsfeel about the highest court upholding President Obama controversial health care law:
The trade group that represents health insurance companies American Health Insurance Plans(AHIP) van cleef and arpel imitation necklace says in their statement that plans will continue to focus on promoting affordability and peace of mind for their beneficiaries. The law expands coverage to millions of Americans, a goal health plans have long supported, but major provisions, such as the premium tax, will have the unintended consequences of raising costs.
But citing research by other sources, AHIPsuggests that the health care law willalso increase the cost of health care coverage, by way of premiums, forcing young Americans to buy artificially high premiums and affordable coverage will be less available. According to a study by Milliman, Inc., an actuarial firm, approximately one sixth of this fee will be placed on Medicaid health plans, but because of federal actuarial soundness requirements, will be paid entirely by state Medicaid programs, already financially strapped even without the upcoming Medicaid expansion. health crisis, and unfortunate reality is that the law, despite its modest benefits, is not a remedy to our health care crisis. Now that the law has been upheld, their say the ruling does not end healthcare crisis or the need to continue the campaign for reform, because replica van cleef arpels necklace they say the ACA still leaves some 27 million people without health coverage.
Their statement goes on to say thatit little to constrain rising out of pocket health care costs, or to stop the all too routine denials of needed medical care by insurance companies because they don't want to pay for it. American Academy of Pediatrics(AAP), which represents 60,000 pediatricians, endorsed the law as well as filing three of the court briefs to the Supreme Court in support of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion, individual mandate and the mandate's severability from the rest of the statute.
The AAP was pleased with the court decision, also calling it a historic decision. AAP president Dr. Robert W. Block said in his organization statement: the Supreme Court upheld a law that invests in children's health from the ground up. He said the ACA addresses the goals that has been the core of the pediatric group has stood for 82 years all children in this country with Access to health care services, age appropriate benefits to meet their unique needs, and high quality, affordable health care coverage."
The Family Research Council, aleading social conservative group,vehemently opposed the high court decision, saying it jeopardizes the future of liberty.
Their statement goes on to say: why today, the American dream gave way to a real American nightmare. President Obama vow about fundamentally transforming the United States of vca imitation necklace America was fulfilled. The Supreme Court essentially said it cannot articulate any limiting principle on the power of the federal government.
The American Cancer Society president John R. Seffrin said the Supreme Court decision ruling preserves critical patient protections for families affected by cancer. He said, "The ruling is a victory for people with cancer and their families nationwide, who for decades have been denied health coverage, charged far more than they can afford for lifesaving care and forced to spend their life savings on necessary treatment, simply because they have a pre existing condition. Both of these have become uber liberal organizations with a near Socialist agenda.
Only a minority of physicians are AMA members, and the AMA should not claim to speak for the majority of docs in this country. Of course, the media perpetuates this myth, that the AMA somehow represents all docs. I wonder van cleef imitation necklaces if the AMA and AAP were very right leaning if the media would be so enamored with them.
June 29, 2012 at 13:18
Report abuse Reply
I am a pediatrician and the AAP never asked me my opinion or any of the pediatricians that I know. We are doctors but we are also hard working taxpayers. I do not support Obamacare. The adminitrative people in charge of the AAP have no clue about the working people, their members. We are too busy working to pay your salaries and to pay those taxes that you just love to spend. Just like the AARP and AMA, not representing the people they claim to be representing. What a joke!
June 29, 2012 at 14:12
Report abuse Reply
I am a dues paying member of the AAP and I do NOT support Obamacare. I am appalled and dismayed by the Supreme Court decision and what it means for this country. We simply cannot afford this!
The AAP (almost as bad as the AMA lately in terms of its obnoxious presumptuousness) needs to STOP making public statements/sending out mass e mails that lead the general public to believe that ALL Pediatricians support this legislation/pseudo socialist POLITICAL agenda.
It NOT all for the children. We sold their future into indentured servitude.
June 29, 2012 at 14:14
Report abuse Reply
I heard Rep. Michelle Bachman say on CNN the day of this decision that insurance premiums for employers had suddenly risen 300% or more.
Michelle Bachman was repeatedly found to be a dubious source of fact during the Presidential Primary season and this was often attributed to her decline in appeal as a candidate.
Does Mitt Romney want her out there representing him and his credibility on health care or any other issue??
No surprise: Reactions to the Supreme Court decision as expected
It didn take long for the first reactions to the Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act to start trickling in. Here a sampling of how some health organizationsfeel about the highest court upholding President Obama controversial health care law:
The trade group that represents health insurance companies American Health Insurance Plans(AHIP) van cleef and arpel imitation necklace says in their statement that plans will continue to focus on promoting affordability and peace of mind for their beneficiaries. The law expands coverage to millions of Americans, a goal health plans have long supported, but major provisions, such as the premium tax, will have the unintended consequences of raising costs.
But citing research by other sources, AHIPsuggests that the health care law willalso increase the cost of health care coverage, by way of premiums, forcing young Americans to buy artificially high premiums and affordable coverage will be less available. According to a study by Milliman, Inc., an actuarial firm, approximately one sixth of this fee will be placed on Medicaid health plans, but because of federal actuarial soundness requirements, will be paid entirely by state Medicaid programs, already financially strapped even without the upcoming Medicaid expansion. health crisis, and unfortunate reality is that the law, despite its modest benefits, is not a remedy to our health care crisis. Now that the law has been upheld, their say the ruling does not end healthcare crisis or the need to continue the campaign for reform, because replica van cleef arpels necklace they say the ACA still leaves some 27 million people without health coverage.
Their statement goes on to say thatit little to constrain rising out of pocket health care costs, or to stop the all too routine denials of needed medical care by insurance companies because they don't want to pay for it. American Academy of Pediatrics(AAP), which represents 60,000 pediatricians, endorsed the law as well as filing three of the court briefs to the Supreme Court in support of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion, individual mandate and the mandate's severability from the rest of the statute.
The AAP was pleased with the court decision, also calling it a historic decision. AAP president Dr. Robert W. Block said in his organization statement: the Supreme Court upheld a law that invests in children's health from the ground up. He said the ACA addresses the goals that has been the core of the pediatric group has stood for 82 years all children in this country with Access to health care services, age appropriate benefits to meet their unique needs, and high quality, affordable health care coverage."
The Family Research Council, aleading social conservative group,vehemently opposed the high court decision, saying it jeopardizes the future of liberty.
Their statement goes on to say: why today, the American dream gave way to a real American nightmare. President Obama vow about fundamentally transforming the United States of vca imitation necklace America was fulfilled. The Supreme Court essentially said it cannot articulate any limiting principle on the power of the federal government.
The American Cancer Society president John R. Seffrin said the Supreme Court decision ruling preserves critical patient protections for families affected by cancer. He said, "The ruling is a victory for people with cancer and their families nationwide, who for decades have been denied health coverage, charged far more than they can afford for lifesaving care and forced to spend their life savings on necessary treatment, simply because they have a pre existing condition. Both of these have become uber liberal organizations with a near Socialist agenda.
Only a minority of physicians are AMA members, and the AMA should not claim to speak for the majority of docs in this country. Of course, the media perpetuates this myth, that the AMA somehow represents all docs. I wonder van cleef imitation necklaces if the AMA and AAP were very right leaning if the media would be so enamored with them.
June 29, 2012 at 13:18
Report abuse Reply
I am a pediatrician and the AAP never asked me my opinion or any of the pediatricians that I know. We are doctors but we are also hard working taxpayers. I do not support Obamacare. The adminitrative people in charge of the AAP have no clue about the working people, their members. We are too busy working to pay your salaries and to pay those taxes that you just love to spend. Just like the AARP and AMA, not representing the people they claim to be representing. What a joke!
June 29, 2012 at 14:12
Report abuse Reply
I am a dues paying member of the AAP and I do NOT support Obamacare. I am appalled and dismayed by the Supreme Court decision and what it means for this country. We simply cannot afford this!
The AAP (almost as bad as the AMA lately in terms of its obnoxious presumptuousness) needs to STOP making public statements/sending out mass e mails that lead the general public to believe that ALL Pediatricians support this legislation/pseudo socialist POLITICAL agenda.
It NOT all for the children. We sold their future into indentured servitude.
June 29, 2012 at 14:14
Report abuse Reply
I heard Rep. Michelle Bachman say on CNN the day of this decision that insurance premiums for employers had suddenly risen 300% or more.
Michelle Bachman was repeatedly found to be a dubious source of fact during the Presidential Primary season and this was often attributed to her decline in appeal as a candidate.
Does Mitt Romney want her out there representing him and his credibility on health care or any other issue??
The Wall