Today In the present people Will be choose replica cartier love banglerose gold in Fashion from fuadiskws's blog
Cocktail Party Physics
"In this elegantly written blog, stories about science and technology come to life as effortlessly as everyday chatter about politics, celebrities, and vacations."
Fast Company ("The Top 10 Websites You've Never Heard Of")
Shhh! Try to keep it down to a low whisper, will ya? Jen Luc Piquant is currently lost deep somewhere in the final Harry Potter book, having waited patiently for her turn and somehow avoided all the online spoilers in the process, no mean feat by now. (Anyone considering trying to ruin the surprise for her should be forewarned: she is ruthless when wreaking her revenge. When you least expect it, she will emerge out of Cyberspace via your computer monitor, just like the ghoulish Samara in the horror flick The Ring, who comes oozing out of the TV to claim her victims. Aieee!) While waiting for myself and Future Spouse to finish our respective readings, Jen Luc perused the biology of Harry Potter (courtesy of the Biology in Science Fiction blog) and re read Roger Highfield entertaining The Science of Harry Potter to keep herself in that Rowling frame of mind. It all a matter of perspective; as Highfield ably demonstrates in his book, quite a bit of cutting edge modern technology is, in its own way, quite magical electronic paper, for example. And just this week, Wired reported that DARPA described as "the Pentagon way out research arm" wants to design a software suite that can help battlefield commanders predict the future. Seriously. They developing a "digital crystal ball" capable of foretelling how any given military mission will turn out beforehand. Professor Trelawney would be so proud. And maybe Oscar the Cat can help with the divination aspects. "the Blade Runner," a double amputee since he was a baby in South Africa. Pistorius was born without fibulae in both of his legs, which were amputated halfway between his knees and ankles just before his first birthday. He always worn prosthetics, taking his first steps on fiberglass pegs, and has always been highly athletic, playing rugby, water polo, tennis, even wrestling before taking up track and field after suffering a serious injury in rugby. He known for refusing special treatment, even perfectly legal ones, like handicapped parking spaces. He says his motto has always been, "You not disabled by the disabilities you have, you are able by the abilities you have."
[UPDATE: There a fascinating post up at my new favorite blog, Neurophilosophy, on the discovery of the 300o year old prosthetic foot. Check it out!]
That motto has served him well thus far. Not yet 21, Pistorius has racked up an impressive string of titles, and is the current Paralympic double amputee world record holder in the 100, 200 and 400 meter events. A few weeks ago, he made his international debut against the world top able bodied runners by running the 400 meter event at the Norwich Union British Grand Prix in Sheffield, England. He didn fare very well, given wet conditions; he placed seventh in a field of eight, and was ultimately disqualified for running outside his lane.
Now Pistorius has set his sights on qualifying for the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing and therein cartier ring price knock off lies the controversy. It not unprecedented: according to a May 15 article in the New York Times, there have been at least three disabled athletes who have competed in the Summer Olympics: an American gymnast with a wooden leg (George Eyser); a paraplegic archer from New Zealand (Neroli Fairhall); and a legally blind American runner (Marla Runyon, who competed in the 1500 meters at the 2000 Summer Olympics in Sidney). There never been an amputee competing in an Olympic track and field event; Pistorius wants to be the first.
The sticking point is whether his prosthetics give him an "unfair advantage" over able bodied athletes. "But the man is a double amputee!" you may well exclaim. I certainly did. Nonetheless, that the gist of objections, and the International Association of Athletics Federation (IAAF) is still mulling over the issue before deciding whether or not Pistorius can compete. (There very little question of his qualifying.) They throw around a lot of impressive scientific jargon when discussing his case, talking about measuring the maximum amount of oxygen his body uses in one minute, per kilogram of body weight (known as an athlete VO2 max), or assessing the mechanical efficiency of his stride using a dizzying array of different techniques, including force plates and 3D kinematics. They already used high definition cameras to film his running motion.
Just what so special about those prosthetics? These days, Pistorius runs on a pair of high tech prosthetic limbs made out of carbon graphite, called Cheetahs, since the J shaped design mimics an actual cheetah foot. They make a telltale "snick snick snick" sound on the asphalt as he runs a sound competitors have come to dread; one fellow runner said he felt like he was "being chased by a giant pair of scissors." They also a bit longer than natural limbs, which some believe enable him to cover more ground with every stride those naysayers include single amputee Paralympic athletes Marlon Shirley and Brian Frasure, both of whom were beaten by Pistorius this past May at the Paralympic competition in Athens. (Jen Luc thinks this sounds a bit like a case of sour grapes.) That not something Pistorius can help: the Cheetahs must be longer than biological legs, to compensate for their imperfect biomechanics. Also, the design means Pistorius runs pretty much on tiptoe.
In fact, the more I read about the objections, the more it sounds like people are basing their objections on perception rather than solid science. Any cited perceived advantage is easily outweighed by everything else that Pistorius must overcome. The Cheetahs are not without their drawbacks. For instance, Pistorius doesn experience the lactic acid buildup that plagues able bodied athletes, but they don have to contend with the possibility that the carbon in an artificial limb will snap at an inopportune moment, sending Pistorius to the ground in a movement that more closely resembles a skier wiping out on the slope than a runner stumbling.
He a slow starter, since he needs to exert more energy to get moving out of the starting blocks that his able bodied competitors; unlike them, his later stage of a race is his strongest and fastest. For that reason, he never be as strong in the shorter 100 meter event; he really shines in the longer 400 meter event, because there he has time to find his rhythm after the inevitable shaky start. As the Sheffield competition made clear, if it raining, he has trouble with traction. And a stiff, strong wind can blow his legs sideways. Most runners lose speed coming out of a turn, but Pistorius might actually gain energy the downside is that once the Cheetahs get going, they can be really tough to control.
Most damning of all is what you find when you crunch the numbers of energy return for Pistorius artificial limbs. The Cheetahs rely on a passive spring to absorb energy as the foot lands, returning energy to propel the next step forward pretty much the same biomechanical concept behind how an able bodied person walks. but the Cheetahs can generate anywhere near the propelling force of a biological limb: landing on a human foot in a running stride has a 241% energy return, thanks to the contraction of leg muscles, compared to a roughly 82% spring efficiency for a passive prosthetic foot like that on the Cheetahs. So Pistorius actually has to work at least 30% harder than his able bodied competitors to compensate for not having the usual collection of muscles, tendons, ligaments, joints and bones and all that power must come from his hips, producing a weird, slightly waddling stride as he runs. The field of prosthetics hasn yet come close to matching Mother Nature design.
Pistorius has plenty of supporters, not just detractors. Hugh Herr, director of MIT Biomechatronics Group and himself a double amputee, thinks Pistorius has "a distinct disadvantage" in track and field: "He just really fast." Robert Gailey, an associate professor in the University of Miami department of physical therapy, agrees with that assessment: "There is no science that he has an advantage, only that he is competing at a disadvantage," he told the New York Times. Imagine running on stilts: that essentially what Pistorius is doing. He just really, really good at it because he been walking and running on stilts since birth. His handlers are fond of saying that anyone who thinks having carbon fiber legs will automatically make them a faster sprinter, should have the operation and meet them at the track.
True, he does have an innate advantage over Shirley and Frasure, both of whom still have one natural leg. Mixed leg sprinters aren as smooth or fast, according to Gailey, because they lose energy to vertical movement by pistoning up and down. Pistorius might cartier wedding ring price fake waddle a little, "but his gait has a circular smoothness." Short of amputating their other legs, Shirley and Frasure will just have to accept this innate shortcoming, or find some other means of compensation.
Pistorius isn some futuristic cyborg, just a gifted runner with two artificial limbs. It easy to confuse the passive prosthetic limbs used by Pistorius with more active models using bionics and robotics. For instance, Herr has developed a giving an amputee a faster and more natural gait, as well as the Rheo Knee, which has a microprocessor and numerous sensors to allow it to adapt to changes in speed, load, and uneven terrain. The motor generates extra power if the user is walking uphill, while downhill, the ankle uses a brake like device to dissipate some of the energy. Similar work on an artificial foot and ankle that can adapt to changing terrains and walking speeds is being done at Northwestern University. (At the very cutting edge is Cyberkinetics in Massachusetts, which implanted 100 electrodes onto the motor cortex of a paralyzed man that enables him to operate a computer or move an artificial arm using just his thoughts. Yikes!)
Despite all the technological bells and whistles, such devices still aren as strong or powerful as natural limbs, and they don respond automatically to signals from the brain, because they aren linked directly to the central nervous system. But someday they might be. In so, then those types of prosthetics conceivably could confer an unfair advantage on a disabled athlete in the not too distant, according to Gailey which might be why the IAAF is concerned about setting a future precedent. Nobody wants to see track and field turn into the massive global embarrassment that has become this summer scandal plagued Tour de France. "If there are no constraints placed on what technology can be used, at some point there will be an advantage," Herr admitted to the New York Times; in fact, that the ultimate goal of such research.
Pistorius success is pushing hard against the traditional boundaries separating disabled and able bodied athletics, and it raising a lot of questions and making a lot of people uncomfortable in the process. Nor is the issue likely to go away: a single amputee named Jeff Skiba competed in the US indoor track and field championships last year. The IAAF recently amended its competition rules to ban the use of "any technical device that incorporates springs, wheels, or any other element that provides a user with an advantage over an athlete not using such a device." They claim this is not intended to target Pistorius, merely to better define what constitutes therapy versus an enhancement.
Even the head of the organization medical and anti doping commission, Juan Manuel Alonso, admitted to the New York Times that "There is no real grounds to say he [Pistorius] should not be allowed to compete" in the Olympics. I say, enough already. Let the man compete. He had to overcome enough. Don make him a poster boy for futuristic technology he not even using. Yet.
Like many people, I have a fondness for shiny things, whether we talking about ideas or actual material baubles anything cool, colorful, or especially eccentric or interesting is likely to catch my magpie minded attention, collected, and stored away for future reference. One must decorate the metaphorical nest, fake cartier diamond ring price after all. For instance, I used to have a set of ammonite jewelry (sadly misplaced in the move to LA), and treasure my butterfly pendant made of actual enameled butterfly wings. (Shhhh! nobody tell PETA!) My good friend Peri is particularly fond of opal jewelry especially when presented to her by an attractive suitor, accompanied by fine wine and lobster thermidor over candlelight and a single orchid. (Jen Luc Piquant thinks this is the very least a potential suitor could offer and commends Peri for adhering to higher standards.)
Peri has some excellent company sharing her taste in gemstones. Queen Victoria adored all things opal, often giving cartier love ring price copy them as wedding presents, and was thrilled when Australia (then part of the British empire) turned out to be an area rich in opals. In the Middle Ages, according to Wikipedia, "Blonde women wore opal necklaces to protect their hair from losing its color." They didn have L back then. They were also believed to be beneficial to eyesight. Pliny, the Roman historian, believed that opal combined "the beauty of all the other gems."
In physics circles, opals (and butterfly wings, for that matter) belong to a class of materials known as photonic crystals a topic I covered before, both here and for The Industrial Physicist. Way back in 1887, Lord Rayleigh first studied how light interacted with the simplest form of a photonic crystal: a one dimensional periodic structure (useful today in things like reflective coatings). It took an entire century to produce 2D and 3D versions, an honor that goes to Eli Yablonovitch and his collaborators, who accomplished the feat in 1991 when Yablonovitch was at Bell Communications Research in New Jersey. They mechanically drilled tiny holes into a block of material now known as "Yablonovite." As expected, the material prevented microwaves from propagating in any direction (a photonic bandgap). And the field exploded, although it took more than a decade to make photonic crystals that blocked near infrared and visible light.In modern times More people will choose fake carti
in relation to cartier ring yellow gold screw copy Latest fad Administrivia recommend give
About cartier ring plating gold nail replica up-to-date vogue press present pass
Today In the present many people would choose imitation cartier love bangleyellow gold at the Fashion world
in relation to cartier necklace white gold juste un clou copy up to the minute vogue magazine suggest grant
"In this elegantly written blog, stories about science and technology come to life as effortlessly as everyday chatter about politics, celebrities, and vacations."
Fast Company ("The Top 10 Websites You've Never Heard Of")
Shhh! Try to keep it down to a low whisper, will ya? Jen Luc Piquant is currently lost deep somewhere in the final Harry Potter book, having waited patiently for her turn and somehow avoided all the online spoilers in the process, no mean feat by now. (Anyone considering trying to ruin the surprise for her should be forewarned: she is ruthless when wreaking her revenge. When you least expect it, she will emerge out of Cyberspace via your computer monitor, just like the ghoulish Samara in the horror flick The Ring, who comes oozing out of the TV to claim her victims. Aieee!) While waiting for myself and Future Spouse to finish our respective readings, Jen Luc perused the biology of Harry Potter (courtesy of the Biology in Science Fiction blog) and re read Roger Highfield entertaining The Science of Harry Potter to keep herself in that Rowling frame of mind. It all a matter of perspective; as Highfield ably demonstrates in his book, quite a bit of cutting edge modern technology is, in its own way, quite magical electronic paper, for example. And just this week, Wired reported that DARPA described as "the Pentagon way out research arm" wants to design a software suite that can help battlefield commanders predict the future. Seriously. They developing a "digital crystal ball" capable of foretelling how any given military mission will turn out beforehand. Professor Trelawney would be so proud. And maybe Oscar the Cat can help with the divination aspects. "the Blade Runner," a double amputee since he was a baby in South Africa. Pistorius was born without fibulae in both of his legs, which were amputated halfway between his knees and ankles just before his first birthday. He always worn prosthetics, taking his first steps on fiberglass pegs, and has always been highly athletic, playing rugby, water polo, tennis, even wrestling before taking up track and field after suffering a serious injury in rugby. He known for refusing special treatment, even perfectly legal ones, like handicapped parking spaces. He says his motto has always been, "You not disabled by the disabilities you have, you are able by the abilities you have."
[UPDATE: There a fascinating post up at my new favorite blog, Neurophilosophy, on the discovery of the 300o year old prosthetic foot. Check it out!]
That motto has served him well thus far. Not yet 21, Pistorius has racked up an impressive string of titles, and is the current Paralympic double amputee world record holder in the 100, 200 and 400 meter events. A few weeks ago, he made his international debut against the world top able bodied runners by running the 400 meter event at the Norwich Union British Grand Prix in Sheffield, England. He didn fare very well, given wet conditions; he placed seventh in a field of eight, and was ultimately disqualified for running outside his lane.
Now Pistorius has set his sights on qualifying for the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing and therein cartier ring price knock off lies the controversy. It not unprecedented: according to a May 15 article in the New York Times, there have been at least three disabled athletes who have competed in the Summer Olympics: an American gymnast with a wooden leg (George Eyser); a paraplegic archer from New Zealand (Neroli Fairhall); and a legally blind American runner (Marla Runyon, who competed in the 1500 meters at the 2000 Summer Olympics in Sidney). There never been an amputee competing in an Olympic track and field event; Pistorius wants to be the first.
The sticking point is whether his prosthetics give him an "unfair advantage" over able bodied athletes. "But the man is a double amputee!" you may well exclaim. I certainly did. Nonetheless, that the gist of objections, and the International Association of Athletics Federation (IAAF) is still mulling over the issue before deciding whether or not Pistorius can compete. (There very little question of his qualifying.) They throw around a lot of impressive scientific jargon when discussing his case, talking about measuring the maximum amount of oxygen his body uses in one minute, per kilogram of body weight (known as an athlete VO2 max), or assessing the mechanical efficiency of his stride using a dizzying array of different techniques, including force plates and 3D kinematics. They already used high definition cameras to film his running motion.
Just what so special about those prosthetics? These days, Pistorius runs on a pair of high tech prosthetic limbs made out of carbon graphite, called Cheetahs, since the J shaped design mimics an actual cheetah foot. They make a telltale "snick snick snick" sound on the asphalt as he runs a sound competitors have come to dread; one fellow runner said he felt like he was "being chased by a giant pair of scissors." They also a bit longer than natural limbs, which some believe enable him to cover more ground with every stride those naysayers include single amputee Paralympic athletes Marlon Shirley and Brian Frasure, both of whom were beaten by Pistorius this past May at the Paralympic competition in Athens. (Jen Luc thinks this sounds a bit like a case of sour grapes.) That not something Pistorius can help: the Cheetahs must be longer than biological legs, to compensate for their imperfect biomechanics. Also, the design means Pistorius runs pretty much on tiptoe.
In fact, the more I read about the objections, the more it sounds like people are basing their objections on perception rather than solid science. Any cited perceived advantage is easily outweighed by everything else that Pistorius must overcome. The Cheetahs are not without their drawbacks. For instance, Pistorius doesn experience the lactic acid buildup that plagues able bodied athletes, but they don have to contend with the possibility that the carbon in an artificial limb will snap at an inopportune moment, sending Pistorius to the ground in a movement that more closely resembles a skier wiping out on the slope than a runner stumbling.
He a slow starter, since he needs to exert more energy to get moving out of the starting blocks that his able bodied competitors; unlike them, his later stage of a race is his strongest and fastest. For that reason, he never be as strong in the shorter 100 meter event; he really shines in the longer 400 meter event, because there he has time to find his rhythm after the inevitable shaky start. As the Sheffield competition made clear, if it raining, he has trouble with traction. And a stiff, strong wind can blow his legs sideways. Most runners lose speed coming out of a turn, but Pistorius might actually gain energy the downside is that once the Cheetahs get going, they can be really tough to control.
Most damning of all is what you find when you crunch the numbers of energy return for Pistorius artificial limbs. The Cheetahs rely on a passive spring to absorb energy as the foot lands, returning energy to propel the next step forward pretty much the same biomechanical concept behind how an able bodied person walks. but the Cheetahs can generate anywhere near the propelling force of a biological limb: landing on a human foot in a running stride has a 241% energy return, thanks to the contraction of leg muscles, compared to a roughly 82% spring efficiency for a passive prosthetic foot like that on the Cheetahs. So Pistorius actually has to work at least 30% harder than his able bodied competitors to compensate for not having the usual collection of muscles, tendons, ligaments, joints and bones and all that power must come from his hips, producing a weird, slightly waddling stride as he runs. The field of prosthetics hasn yet come close to matching Mother Nature design.
Pistorius has plenty of supporters, not just detractors. Hugh Herr, director of MIT Biomechatronics Group and himself a double amputee, thinks Pistorius has "a distinct disadvantage" in track and field: "He just really fast." Robert Gailey, an associate professor in the University of Miami department of physical therapy, agrees with that assessment: "There is no science that he has an advantage, only that he is competing at a disadvantage," he told the New York Times. Imagine running on stilts: that essentially what Pistorius is doing. He just really, really good at it because he been walking and running on stilts since birth. His handlers are fond of saying that anyone who thinks having carbon fiber legs will automatically make them a faster sprinter, should have the operation and meet them at the track.
True, he does have an innate advantage over Shirley and Frasure, both of whom still have one natural leg. Mixed leg sprinters aren as smooth or fast, according to Gailey, because they lose energy to vertical movement by pistoning up and down. Pistorius might cartier wedding ring price fake waddle a little, "but his gait has a circular smoothness." Short of amputating their other legs, Shirley and Frasure will just have to accept this innate shortcoming, or find some other means of compensation.
Pistorius isn some futuristic cyborg, just a gifted runner with two artificial limbs. It easy to confuse the passive prosthetic limbs used by Pistorius with more active models using bionics and robotics. For instance, Herr has developed a giving an amputee a faster and more natural gait, as well as the Rheo Knee, which has a microprocessor and numerous sensors to allow it to adapt to changes in speed, load, and uneven terrain. The motor generates extra power if the user is walking uphill, while downhill, the ankle uses a brake like device to dissipate some of the energy. Similar work on an artificial foot and ankle that can adapt to changing terrains and walking speeds is being done at Northwestern University. (At the very cutting edge is Cyberkinetics in Massachusetts, which implanted 100 electrodes onto the motor cortex of a paralyzed man that enables him to operate a computer or move an artificial arm using just his thoughts. Yikes!)
Despite all the technological bells and whistles, such devices still aren as strong or powerful as natural limbs, and they don respond automatically to signals from the brain, because they aren linked directly to the central nervous system. But someday they might be. In so, then those types of prosthetics conceivably could confer an unfair advantage on a disabled athlete in the not too distant, according to Gailey which might be why the IAAF is concerned about setting a future precedent. Nobody wants to see track and field turn into the massive global embarrassment that has become this summer scandal plagued Tour de France. "If there are no constraints placed on what technology can be used, at some point there will be an advantage," Herr admitted to the New York Times; in fact, that the ultimate goal of such research.
Pistorius success is pushing hard against the traditional boundaries separating disabled and able bodied athletics, and it raising a lot of questions and making a lot of people uncomfortable in the process. Nor is the issue likely to go away: a single amputee named Jeff Skiba competed in the US indoor track and field championships last year. The IAAF recently amended its competition rules to ban the use of "any technical device that incorporates springs, wheels, or any other element that provides a user with an advantage over an athlete not using such a device." They claim this is not intended to target Pistorius, merely to better define what constitutes therapy versus an enhancement.
Even the head of the organization medical and anti doping commission, Juan Manuel Alonso, admitted to the New York Times that "There is no real grounds to say he [Pistorius] should not be allowed to compete" in the Olympics. I say, enough already. Let the man compete. He had to overcome enough. Don make him a poster boy for futuristic technology he not even using. Yet.
Like many people, I have a fondness for shiny things, whether we talking about ideas or actual material baubles anything cool, colorful, or especially eccentric or interesting is likely to catch my magpie minded attention, collected, and stored away for future reference. One must decorate the metaphorical nest, fake cartier diamond ring price after all. For instance, I used to have a set of ammonite jewelry (sadly misplaced in the move to LA), and treasure my butterfly pendant made of actual enameled butterfly wings. (Shhhh! nobody tell PETA!) My good friend Peri is particularly fond of opal jewelry especially when presented to her by an attractive suitor, accompanied by fine wine and lobster thermidor over candlelight and a single orchid. (Jen Luc Piquant thinks this is the very least a potential suitor could offer and commends Peri for adhering to higher standards.)
Peri has some excellent company sharing her taste in gemstones. Queen Victoria adored all things opal, often giving cartier love ring price copy them as wedding presents, and was thrilled when Australia (then part of the British empire) turned out to be an area rich in opals. In the Middle Ages, according to Wikipedia, "Blonde women wore opal necklaces to protect their hair from losing its color." They didn have L back then. They were also believed to be beneficial to eyesight. Pliny, the Roman historian, believed that opal combined "the beauty of all the other gems."
In physics circles, opals (and butterfly wings, for that matter) belong to a class of materials known as photonic crystals a topic I covered before, both here and for The Industrial Physicist. Way back in 1887, Lord Rayleigh first studied how light interacted with the simplest form of a photonic crystal: a one dimensional periodic structure (useful today in things like reflective coatings). It took an entire century to produce 2D and 3D versions, an honor that goes to Eli Yablonovitch and his collaborators, who accomplished the feat in 1991 when Yablonovitch was at Bell Communications Research in New Jersey. They mechanically drilled tiny holes into a block of material now known as "Yablonovite." As expected, the material prevented microwaves from propagating in any direction (a photonic bandgap). And the field exploded, although it took more than a decade to make photonic crystals that blocked near infrared and visible light.
The Wall